That may be a "ring" in your kind and friendly world, Bruce, but that's not what those collectors from the UK are referring to when they talk about the "UK gramophone ring". No, sadly it isn't; what the latter refers to is a small group (usually no more than 6 persons) of dealers who are in it solely for the money and profit making. They work together to ensure that they buy all the best machines that rarely turn up in the large antique fairs / auctions and specialist sales. They do this by pre-arranging to not bid against each other at an auction and nominate whoever is nearest to it to go and 'secure it'. They then PRIVATELY re-auction the item amongst themselves to find out who the real winner would have been had they not agreed to stay away from the REAL auction. That person wins it and splits the difference of the two realised prices between the others. Therefore the winner gets the machine cheaper and the others get a slice of the 'profit' that should have rightfully and legally gone to the poor vendor of the item. Consider this, if they DIDN'T operate an illegal ring then the dealers who didn't win the item would get NOTHING and would be forced to walk away empty handed. It's simply a way to ensure that their precious time is taken care of by financial compensation. If you were a collector you'd expect to either win the machine or walk away with nothing? Auction rings are illegal although not uncommon in the dirty antiques business. This all assumes that the 'ring' do secure the item far more cheaply at the genuine auction than they might have done had the dealers been bidding against each other in the normal way. You might wonder why no one else dares to bid against them if the item is that good? Well, it is not unknown for one or two nasty people to physically threaten anyone who was intending to bid against them or to use other forms of intimidation or 'negotiation'.Isn't "the ring" in any hobby simply a small group of people who;
- spend a lot of time with the hobby
- therefore among the most knowledgeable
- have the valuable stuff and/or
- know what it's worth
- have the money and are the most willing and able to spend it
- and, for the above reasons, tend to trade mostly amongst themselves?
Another thing they do is put up a front that each of them solely owns a machine with a view to seeing who amongst them can get the most for it from a gullible collector and then they split the profits again. The main point to remember is that MOST of the people involved in the UK have access to some money. They aren't poor and can well afford to play games if it is deemed worthwhile in the long run. That is to say that if you, Bruce, went to an auction to buy something that you wanted for your collection they would have great fun running you up seeing as though the risk to them is less than it is for you (if you grossly over-pay for something) given that they have their risk shared with others and when they jointly own stock the risk gets dissipated amongst the other items. It's a dishonest practice and as I said previously, totally unfair and illegal. The biggest loser is the vendor though.