French Monarque

Discussions on Talking Machines of British or European Manufacture
User avatar
Steve
Victor VI
Posts: 3123
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:40 pm
Location: London, Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, New York, Evesham

Re: French Monarque

Post by Steve »

Jerry B. wrote:What I find interesting is the cover over the front mount hole. Was that cover included with all of the rear mount parts when a machine was converted? Why cover the hole because it's now in the back of the machine and really not seen?

Jerry Blais
Maybe the British / European consumers were a little more particular about how their machines looked, even on the "blind sides"? ;)
As for the plate itself, and to answer your question specifically, yes, the cover was included with all rear mount conversions done by the factory and / or dealerships. However, the one Teak has is the less common of two designs - the other is a little more bulky in appearance. If I can find a picture of that one I'll post it here in this thread.

User avatar
Steve
Victor VI
Posts: 3123
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:40 pm
Location: London, Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, New York, Evesham

Re: French Monarque

Post by Steve »

Jerry B. wrote:I'm certainly no authority on European versions of Victor products and don't pretend to be. Here in the States original owners occasionally upgraded from the black & brass horn to the Flower or wood horn to make their machine more current. Perhaps that practice was less common elsewhere.

I have seen many Victor cabinets factory drilled for either front or rear mount applications. Those machines were built during the transition when any given model could be sold in either configuration. I was suggesting this machine fell into this time period.

My "rigid arm" MS has the back bracket mounted where a tapered arm back bracket is also mounted. Do European collectors refer to front mount setups as "rigid arm"? When the owner of a front mount Victor purchased the assembly to convert his machine to a rear mount was a plug to cover the front mount holes included? I'd still look for small nail holes. If it has little holes around the tapered arm back bracket area it started as a front mount.

Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Blais
I'm not suggesting that outside the States no one ever upgraded their machines but to the original questioner I was suggesting that from a purely and historically accurate perspective the later horn types would be incorrect. After all, anyone can replace a horn at any time but then it no longer reflects the original machine as it was sold. I don't know what terminology European collectors use but my reference to "rigid arm" was to describe the fixed support bracket (arm) that holds the pivoting floating or "travelling" arm. I apologise if my terminology was confusing there; maybe "bracket" is a more appropriate term?

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 5282
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: French Monarque

Post by JerryVan »

jboger wrote:That being the case, I doubt it started life as a rear-mount machine that someone then converted to a front-mount.

Neither Jerry nor I have suggested that.

User avatar
maestro2009
Victor O
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:30 am
Personal Text: Collector
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Contact:

Re: French Monarque

Post by maestro2009 »

I will clarify. Plug on the box the topic starter is not original.The plugs were really used, but looked different.The reason for this was the abundance in the stock housings for the front mounts.And when, in 1903, he invented the tone arm,the case is continued to use.I have a picture of these plugs found! Usually it was a German product.
Attachments
image from Russian magazine 1904-1905
image from Russian magazine 1904-1905
Grammophone_and_Phonograph_1904_05 разгадка.jpg

Teak
Victor II
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:55 am
Location: Vienna/Austria

Re: French Monarque

Post by Teak »

The picture in the french gramophone catalogue on page 1 suggests otherwise!

User avatar
maestro2009
Victor O
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:30 am
Personal Text: Collector
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Contact:

Re: French Monarque

Post by maestro2009 »

from official 1903 catalog
Attachments
1903 монарх.jpg

Teak
Victor II
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:55 am
Location: Vienna/Austria

Re: French Monarque

Post by Teak »

I see your point, but mine is also valide! :D
We both can be right!

User avatar
alang
VTLA
Posts: 3109
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:36 am
Personal Text: TMF Moderator
Location: Delaware

Re: French Monarque

Post by alang »

I agree, you could both be right. When the original transition happened from the front mount to the rigid arm like pictured on the Russian catalog above, they included a plug with a holder for a horn crane. The reason for that was that the elbow of the rigid arm was not strong enough to hold a larger horn. I can imagine that a bit later there were conversion kits from front mount to tapered arm. These new elbows were much sturdier and did not need a horn crane. That could have led to supplying a flat plug without a crane holder. This has been discussed here beforehttp://forum.talkingmachine.info/viewto ... =2&t=28235, but I have not seen any pictures or other proof of such a horn crane, or of a flat plug included in a taper arm conversion kit. I only know that there must have been both types of kits, because there are covers that say "Remove to install Rigid Arm", as well as "Remove to install Tapered Arm" (sorry if my wording isn't exactly correct). Including a crane holder in a tapered arm kit would not have made sense.

Andreas

Teak
Victor II
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:55 am
Location: Vienna/Austria

Re: French Monarque

Post by Teak »

I think the true story will be lost forever. Still, I think I can discern my plaque here:
Attachments
gramo9.jpg
fullsizeoutput_1d8.jpeg
fullsizeoutput_1d8.jpeg (28.83 KiB) Viewed 1402 times

Teak
Victor II
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:55 am
Location: Vienna/Austria

Re: French Monarque

Post by Teak »

is there a bracket, holding the front mount brace? Would that leave an imprint inside the case?

Post Reply