Sound Box Conundrum...
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:56 am
Hi, My first post on here having started my shellac journey before Christmas and on the excellent advice of Orchorsol just purchased a beautiful Micro-Perophone Chromogram MP22.
The MP22's motor was refurbished by a retired engineer and looks (and sounds) in excellent condition, he bought the machine without a sound box and fitted an HMV 4, I purchased a Meltrope III and have been trying out both.
The problem I have is that the Meltrope is tonally very good, especially with vocals but lacks definition with consonants. S's, M's, F's are very smudgy and ill-defined. The HMV 4 gives good 'annunciation' but is lacking tonally where the Meltrope really shines.
Both sound boxes look in good condition and the only real physical difference is that the Meltrope grips the tonearm with an elderly (though not perished) rubber collar while the HMV has a more robust, firmer bayonet fitting.
Is it just a fact of life with this old kit and I'll need to try a few more sound boxes? Or is there something else I should be doing?
The MP22's motor was refurbished by a retired engineer and looks (and sounds) in excellent condition, he bought the machine without a sound box and fitted an HMV 4, I purchased a Meltrope III and have been trying out both.
The problem I have is that the Meltrope is tonally very good, especially with vocals but lacks definition with consonants. S's, M's, F's are very smudgy and ill-defined. The HMV 4 gives good 'annunciation' but is lacking tonally where the Meltrope really shines.
Both sound boxes look in good condition and the only real physical difference is that the Meltrope grips the tonearm with an elderly (though not perished) rubber collar while the HMV has a more robust, firmer bayonet fitting.
Is it just a fact of life with this old kit and I'll need to try a few more sound boxes? Or is there something else I should be doing?