Featured Phonograph № 30

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
phonocookie
Victor I
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:44 pm

Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by phonocookie »

Make: Musicalphone
Model: ?
Serial #
Year(s) Made: 1906
Original Cost: ?
Case/Cabinet Size:
Turntable/Mandrel:
Reproducer/Sound-Box: Columbia Style
Motor: Columbia
Horn Dimensions: 21" Long
Reproduction Parts: None that I know off
Current Value: $1,200 to ?
Interesting Facts: Reproducer has Musicalphone The Englewood Co on it.

Favorite Characteristics:
Attachments
IMG_0716.JPG
IMG_0717.JPG
IMG_0718.JPG
IMG_0719.JPG
IMG_0720.JPG
IMG_0721.JPG

gramophoneshane
Victor VI
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by gramophoneshane »

Now that's what I like to see....Something I've never seen before :)
What a great machine, and it's in such nice condition too.
I wonder if they ever had trouble from Columbia for copying their product/designs, or is this another of Columbias client machines?
Does anyone know if this was the only model the company produced, or did they go on to bigger & better things?
Thanks for sharing this one Phonocookie!

User avatar
Edisonfan
Victor V
Posts: 2095
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:37 pm
Personal Text: Invention is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration
Location: Frederick Maryland

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by Edisonfan »

Very nice phono. Phonocokie.

Roaring20s

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by Roaring20s »

GOLDEN CROWN MUSICALPHONE Label
http://recordlbls6.blogspot.com/2008/10 ... crown.html

Here is another bit I found that puts it in context with Columbia
http://www.timbrooks.net/PDFs/colhist02.pdf
Interesting reading too.

From the above article section entitled Leased Masters.

... Columbia also continued to produce seven-inch and single-faced discs for Sears, long after Columbia itself had abandoned those formats. Additional custom-pressing contracts followed, including Peerless (1903) for the W.S. Simpson department store, Golden Crown Musicalphone (1905) and New Improved Silver Tongued (1906) for a Chicago mail order firm, Kalamazoo (1907) for the Duplex Phonograph Co. of that city, and Thomas (1907), D&R (1909), Manhattan (1909) and Cort (1910) for various stores. ...

James.

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3829
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by Valecnik »

Roaring20s wrote:GOLDEN CROWN MUSICALPHONE Label
http://recordlbls6.blogspot.com/2008/10 ... crown.html

Here is another bit I found that puts it in context with Columbia
http://www.timbrooks.net/PDFs/colhist02.pdf
Interesting reading too.

From the above article section entitled Leased Masters.

... Columbia also continued to produce seven-inch and single-faced discs for Sears, long after Columbia itself had abandoned those formats. Additional custom-pressing contracts followed, including Peerless (1903) for the W.S. Simpson department store, Golden Crown Musicalphone (1905) and New Improved Silver Tongued (1906) for a Chicago mail order firm, Kalamazoo (1907) for the Duplex Phonograph Co. of that city, and Thomas (1907), D&R (1909), Manhattan (1909) and Cort (1910) for various stores. ...

James.
Wow so they had their own record label too. Very interesting Phonocookie. Nice Phono and really good condition too.

User avatar
B.B.B
Victor I
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:02 am
Location: In the land of Pork & Bergman

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by B.B.B »

What a nice machine!
Stunning condition for something that old.

Thanks a lot for sharing!

btw, have you played any records on it, if so, how does it perform?
Searching for The Sound

phonocookie
Victor I
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:44 pm

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by phonocookie »

B.B.B wrote:What a nice machine!
Stunning condition for something that old.

Thanks a lot for sharing!

btw, have you played any records on it, if so, how does it perform?
Hi. The machine runs quite well. The sound is good but a lot has to do with the record you play.

User avatar
orthophoNik
Victor Jr
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:11 pm

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by orthophoNik »

That really is a great machine and in such stunning condition too (the horn in particular). Does anyone know how much one of these would of cost when new? Also would this be considered a standard phonograph or one of the higher end models in its day (sorry if this is a stupid question)?
Thanks for sharing it.
Nik

USlakeside
Victor III
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:54 am
Location: The BRONX / Yankee Stadium

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by USlakeside »

Did this machine also have a morning glory horn option? I feel like I saw a front mount machine maybe a year ago on ebay with a morning glory horn..

phonocookie
Victor I
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:44 pm

Re: Featured Phonograph № 30

Post by phonocookie »

Hi. There may be other machines out there with different horns. You just don't see that much information about them. They must not been a big seller or only sold for a very short time. I would like to see more pictures of that machine.

Post Reply