Automatic reproducer volume

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
tomb
Victor IV
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:46 pm
Location: riverside calif

Automatic reproducer volume

Post by tomb »

I was playing a cylinder on my standard two latch with a automatic reproducer and I could not get a high volume . I Tried three other automatics and the volume was about the same some a little louder one had less volume... A C- reproducer had higher volume. Are most automatic reproducers low volume or do they need rebuilt. ??? Tom B

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor VI
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Automatic reproducer volume

Post by gramophone-georg »

tomb wrote:I was playing a cylinder on my standard two latch with a automatic reproducer and I could not get a high volume . I Tried three other automatics and the volume was about the same some a little louder one had less volume... A C- reproducer had higher volume. Are most automatic reproducers low volume or do they need rebuilt. ??? Tom B
They have their own quite severe limitations. Mica Monster came up with a good solution for mine with a reproducer gasket he made.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
WDC
Victor IV
Posts: 1015
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:07 am

Re: Automatic reproducer volume

Post by WDC »

Automatic reproducers have a significantly lighter weight than most later reproducers. This is why an Automatic is highly recommended for brown wax cylinders. It is much more gentle to the groove. Because the elliptical doorknob stylus can be quite rough on a record, I usually avoid a C reproducer even on black wax.

Differences within Automatic reproducer series can be also caused by different diaphragms. Even back then, glass diaphragms were made in different grades of thickness, which can make a world of difference. I haven't tried MicaMonster's tuning methods myself yet but he definitely knows what he is doing and has come up with some incredible results on other reproducers as well.

tomb
Victor IV
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:46 pm
Location: riverside calif

Re: Automatic reproducer volume

Post by tomb »

WDC wrote:Automatic reproducers have a significantly lighter weight than most later reproducers. This is why an Automatic is highly recommended for brown wax cylinders. It is much more gentle to the groove. Because the elliptical doorknob stylus can be quite rough on a record, I usually avoid a C reproducer even on black wax.

Differences within Automatic reproducer series can be also caused by different diaphragms. Even back then, glass diaphragms were made in different grades of thickness, which can make a world of difference. I haven't tried MicaMonster's tuning methods myself yet but he definitely knows what he is doing and has come up with some incredible results on other reproducers as well.
Thanks for the information. I only have a couple of brown wax which will be played using the automatic reproducer. I was thinking of sending in a couple to Steve Medved for rebuilding. That may increase the output. I am not handy with rebuilding items with small parts any more. Tom

Post Reply