This is just a confirmation of your BII. This picture shows one with a Grand reproducer, however the Concert Grand was an option. The horn on this one was original to the machine when we acquired it unrestored.
Would love to see yours when you finish the restore. Russie
What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right?
- startgroove
- Victor III
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:01 pm
- Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Thank you, Epigramophone, for the scan of your 1913 UK catalog. It reminded me of the late 1909-1910 Columbia catalog (which has been widely reproduced) which shows these same horns:
Here's another scan from the late 1909-1910 catalog showing the BII offered with a choice of the "No.1" Wood Horn (shown), a "Nickel Horn," the "No.2" Wood Horn, or the Symphony: All this makes me question whether the smooth horns encountered as original factory equipment with Columbia machines are Music Master. Sheip & Vandegrift (manufacturer of Music Master horns) always marked its horns with a decal. Unless the decal or a black support band (sometimes seen on Music Master horns) is present, I suspect these Columbia Symphony horns are products of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Company.
George P.
Note the same statement: "It is built up of steam-shaped staves of solid mahogany or quartered oak - - in two layers, all the joints overlapping." Music Master horns were advertised as being solid wood, with all the acoustic advantages supposedly inherent in a solid wood phonograph horn. The Columbia "Symphony" was almost certainly a product of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Company, and the "No.2" certainly was.Here's another scan from the late 1909-1910 catalog showing the BII offered with a choice of the "No.1" Wood Horn (shown), a "Nickel Horn," the "No.2" Wood Horn, or the Symphony: All this makes me question whether the smooth horns encountered as original factory equipment with Columbia machines are Music Master. Sheip & Vandegrift (manufacturer of Music Master horns) always marked its horns with a decal. Unless the decal or a black support band (sometimes seen on Music Master horns) is present, I suspect these Columbia Symphony horns are products of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Company.
George P.
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:53 pm
- Location: Michiana
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Ah, but they are not!
Every original BNWM that I have owned or examined (and I've owned three and seen several others) was fitted with the solid horn with the black reinforcement, as was the one wood horn equipped BNW.
The 85H which turned up at Stanton's some years ago was also fitted with an oak Music Master horn, as I recall, though that rare machine appears to have been since parted out, for I purchased the cabinet in 2014. Now all I need is a 1912 vintage Columbia electric motor and a correct back bracket.
Every original BNWM that I have owned or examined (and I've owned three and seen several others) was fitted with the solid horn with the black reinforcement, as was the one wood horn equipped BNW.
The 85H which turned up at Stanton's some years ago was also fitted with an oak Music Master horn, as I recall, though that rare machine appears to have been since parted out, for I purchased the cabinet in 2014. Now all I need is a 1912 vintage Columbia electric motor and a correct back bracket.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Thank you once again, Uncle!
While the machines you cite comprise a small sample, your experience is wide enough that I give it more credence than I otherwise would (and that Scientific Method might demand). Now I'm wondering if Columbia might have contracted with Sheip & Vandegrift for Music Master horns after those of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Co. became unavailable (?). If so, this would tend to confine the use of Music Master horns to relatively late Columbia external-horn machines.
Of course, a dealer could always supply a Music Master horn for any customer who really wanted one - - like my Victor VI of 25 years ago - - but that would seem to be a rare occurrence.
In any event, the Columbia Symphony horns illustrated in the catalog above lack the black supporting band, and the text makes it clear that they are not solid pieces of wood as employed in the Music Master horns.
George P.
While the machines you cite comprise a small sample, your experience is wide enough that I give it more credence than I otherwise would (and that Scientific Method might demand). Now I'm wondering if Columbia might have contracted with Sheip & Vandegrift for Music Master horns after those of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Co. became unavailable (?). If so, this would tend to confine the use of Music Master horns to relatively late Columbia external-horn machines.
Of course, a dealer could always supply a Music Master horn for any customer who really wanted one - - like my Victor VI of 25 years ago - - but that would seem to be a rare occurrence.
In any event, the Columbia Symphony horns illustrated in the catalog above lack the black supporting band, and the text makes it clear that they are not solid pieces of wood as employed in the Music Master horns.
George P.
- Django
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:31 pm
- Location: New Hampshire’s West Coast
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
You would have been a great detective.phonogfp wrote:Thank you once again, Uncle!
While the machines you cite comprise a small sample, your experience is wide enough that I give it more credence than I otherwise would (and that Scientific Method might demand). Now I'm wondering if Columbia might have contracted with Sheip & Vandegrift for Music Master horns after those of the Wooden Phonograph Horn Co. became unavailable (?). If so, this would tend to confine the use of Music Master horns to relatively late Columbia external-horn machines.
Of course, a dealer could always supply a Music Master horn for any customer who really wanted one - - like my Victor VI of 25 years ago - - but that would seem to be a rare occurrence.
In any event, the Columbia Symphony horns illustrated in the catalog above lack the black supporting band, and the text makes it clear that they are not solid pieces of wood as employed in the Music Master horns.
George P.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
You meant "defective," right?Django wrote:
You would have been a great detective.
George P.
- Retrograde
- Victor III
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:47 pm
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
The P. is for Poirotphonogfp wrote:You meant "defective," right?Django wrote:
You would have been a great detective.
George P.
- Django
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:31 pm
- Location: New Hampshire’s West Coast
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Good catchphonogfp wrote:You meant "defective," right?Django wrote:
You would have been a great detective.
George P.
-
- Victor O
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:24 pm
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Well, I tried polishing the elbow, and, as expected, quickly got down to brass. Curiously, I don't believe the back bracket is brass because, unlike the tone arm and elbow, it is magnetic. Maybe it's steel?Django wrote:As far as replating goes, I would try cleaning and polishing first. If it looks presentable, leave it. If not, have it plated. I would rather have original playing that is less than perfect than plated parts that look out of place. In the end it is a matter preference.
Were these all definitely nickel-plated to begin with?
-
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
- Location: Southeast MI
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
The back bracket is cast iron.