What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right?
-
- Victor O
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:24 pm
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Interesting. Do you know when they started doing so? That BI has a Music Master, so I assume it was after that. What would have been standard equipment on this phonograph?
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2694
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
If I remember right, the Sears & Roebuck catalogs called the reproducer with the aluminum diaphragm, the “Analyzing Reproducer”. These probably sounded better than mica.
- Django
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:31 pm
- Location: New Hampshire’s West Coast
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
I have that same horn on my BI. The condition of yours looks quite good. I don’t know if the small hole is worth bothering with. If I was going to repair the hole I would glue a dowel in, keeping it sub flush to both surfaces. Then I would make some sawdust from Oak, stained close to a match. Add some white glue to one face of the dowel and add some sawdust. After it sets up, you can turn the horn over and do opposite end. It works quite well.
The missing piece would require finding some closely matching veneer. Make a pattern and build it up in thin layers and clamp the glued layers around a curved surface with a radius close to that of the horn. After the glue sets up it will retain the curve. Stain to match. Shellac and them dull the finish to match. If you luck out, it will be at the bottom of the horn when it’s mounted.
I have a BII and a BI. I don’t know the production numbers, but I have seen many more of the BI.
As far as replating goes, I would try cleaning and polishing first. If it looks presentable, leave it. If not, have it plated. I would rather have original playing that is less than perfect than plated parts that look out of place. In the end it is a matter preference.
The missing piece would require finding some closely matching veneer. Make a pattern and build it up in thin layers and clamp the glued layers around a curved surface with a radius close to that of the horn. After the glue sets up it will retain the curve. Stain to match. Shellac and them dull the finish to match. If you luck out, it will be at the bottom of the horn when it’s mounted.
I have a BII and a BI. I don’t know the production numbers, but I have seen many more of the BI.
As far as replating goes, I would try cleaning and polishing first. If it looks presentable, leave it. If not, have it plated. I would rather have original playing that is less than perfect than plated parts that look out of place. In the end it is a matter preference.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Music Master horns were offered as aftermarket items, and I don't believe they were offered by Columbia. Such a horn would have been purchased or ordered through a dealer. I once found a Victor VI equipped with a Music Master horn in a house. The only manufacturers I can think of who offered Music Master horns on their machines as original equipment are Edison and Vitaphone. There may be others, but I'm pretty sure Columbia wasn't one of them.Hyperion wrote:Interesting. Do you know when they started doing so? That BI has a Music Master, so I assume it was after that. What would have been standard equipment on this phonograph?
George P.
-
- Victor O
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:24 pm
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Interesting. In your opinion, would the presence of such a horn on a machine add value to it as compared to a Columbia dealer-offered wooden horn?phonogfp wrote:Music Master horns were offered as aftermarket items, and I don't believe they were offered by Columbia. Such a horn would have been purchased or ordered through a dealer.Hyperion wrote:Interesting. Do you know when they started doing so? That BI has a Music Master, so I assume it was after that. What would have been standard equipment on this phonograph?
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:53 pm
- Location: Michiana
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
I never saw Music Master horn's offered as standard equipment on the BI or BII in any of the Columbia advertising material that I've seen, but the smooth Music Master horn's WERE supplied with the BNW and with the BNWM. In fact I have a filthy, untouched, attic find BNWM with just such a horn which is awaiting rejuvenation.phonogfp wrote:Music Master horns were offered as aftermarket items, and I don't believe they were offered by Columbia. Such a horn would have been purchased or ordered through a dealer. I once found a Victor VI equipped with a Music Master horn in a house. The only manufacturers I can think of who offered Music Master horns on their machines as original equipment are Edison and Vitaphone. There may be others, but I'm pretty sure Columbia wasn't one of them.Hyperion wrote:Interesting. Do you know when they started doing so? That BI has a Music Master, so I assume it was after that. What would have been standard equipment on this phonograph?
George P.
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Personally, I like the Wooden Phonograph Horn Co. product more, but that's purely a question of taste. Many, many collectors don't want a machine that isn't "catalog equipped."Hyperion wrote:Interesting. In your opinion, would the presence of such a horn on a machine add value to it as compared to a Columbia dealer-offered wooden horn?phonogfp wrote:Music Master horns were offered as aftermarket items, and I don't believe they were offered by Columbia. Such a horn would have been purchased or ordered through a dealer.Hyperion wrote:Interesting. Do you know when they started doing so? That BI has a Music Master, so I assume it was after that. What would have been standard equipment on this phonograph?
Thanks for that - - and now that you mention it, a BNWM with a Music Master seems vaguely familiar. A few of the late (1910-1912) Zonophones too. Do you happen to have a catalog illustration/description of a BNW or BNWM with such a horn?Uncle Vanya wrote:
I never saw Music Master horn's offered as standard equipment on the BI or BII in any of the Columbia advertising material that I've seen, but the smooth Music Master horn's WERE supplied with the BNW and with the BNWM. In fact I have a filthy, untouched, attic find BNWM with just such a horn which is awaiting rejuvenation.
George P.
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:53 pm
- Location: Michiana
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Here is the catalog page for (as I recall) 1913.
The 1915 catalog shows the 60H with the oak version of this horn:- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
Beautiful! Thank you, Uncle - -
George P.
George P.
-
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
- Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
- Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.
Re: What is this machine, and does the reproducer look right
From the 1913 UK Columbia catalogue, extolling the merits of wooden horns :
- Attachments
-
- 1913.jpg (85.66 KiB) Viewed 1006 times