JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by gramophone78 »

Very nice pics Mike of some wonderful examples.
Of course the closed face Clark/Johnson sound box was promoted as the "Exhibition" during the late 1890's.
1899 Berliner Catalogue.jpg
1899 Berliner Catalogue.jpg (84.72 KiB) Viewed 1248 times

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 7384
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by phonogfp »

Mlund2020 wrote: The Berliner JS was very short lived, resulting in it’s extreme rarity today. I believe that it was the attempt of Berliner and Johnson to appease Frank Seaman’s ongoing request for a less expensive machine that he could market. It was apparently too little too late and soon after this machine was released, the courts put the Berliner Gramophone company out of business in the US.
Well, we already know by the advertisement I posted earlier in this thread that the JS had appeared by late 1898. The injunction against Berliner in the U.S. didn't happen until June 25, 1900. Based upon the small number of survivors, no known examples with National Gramophone Corporation decals, and the dearth of advertising for this model, I don't believe the JS was in production for over a year.
Mlund2020 wrote: I think that the G&T style 4 with metal motor housing was released in 1897 which would predate the Berliner JS.
The Gramophone Company wasn't established until May 1898, so that in itself would rule out the 1897 introduction of the Style No.4. The first machines marketed by the company were shipped over from the U.S., so that too would argue against the No.4 predating the JS. I've never done any research on when the No.4 was introduced in the UK/Europe, but in His Master's Gramophone, Brian Oakley and Christopher Proudfoot state that it was November 1900.

George P.

User avatar
Mlund2020
Victor II
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by Mlund2020 »

phonogfp wrote:
Mlund2020 wrote: I hope that you don’t mind that a lot of the information used in many of my display description tags (this one included) was borrowed form your books.
the Second Edition of the Compendium (2005) contains a corrected caption for the JS...one of over 100 corrections/additions.

George P.
I have that edition and just looked it up and all the correct info on the $15 JS and $18 Improved Gramophone is there. In fact I just noticed that I have 2 copies of this edition. I must have like it so much that I bought a spare. I was clearly looking at another reference or older edition when I was typing a description of the JS for my display. It is a great book as all your books are, they have been an invaluable resource for me.
Attachments
C74DD809-18BE-4F82-9FA5-D3A2CE58901D.jpeg
2DEBD23A-C442-4F1B-B715-599343580A55.jpeg
BE35BB32-765D-4C90-94D2-AAA2EA83B230.jpeg

User avatar
Mlund2020
Victor II
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by Mlund2020 »

phonogfp wrote:
The Gramophone Company wasn't established until May 1898, so that in itself would rule out the 1897 introduction of the Style No.4. The first machines marketed by the company were shipped over from the U.S., so that too would argue against the No.4 predating the JS. I've never done any research on when the No.4 was introduced in the UK/Europe, but in His Master's Gramophone, Brian Oakley and Christopher Proudfoot state that it was November 1900.

George P.
Thanks for the clarification. I knew that you would know the correct answer. Now I have 2 description tags to correct. Oh well, it is a work in progress.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 7384
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by phonogfp »

Thanks again for your kind words about the books, Mike! :)

Sorry about causing you all that work, though...

George P.

OrthoFan
Victor V
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by OrthoFan »

phonogfp wrote:Well, I don't know if my insight into the meaning of "JS" is any better than yours, Mike. "Johnson Scheme," "Johnson Special," maybe "Johnson Sport!" ;)
George P.
One last speculation on my part... Looking at the add, I see the word "Standard" appears capitalized three times when referring to the more expensive model:
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (164.87 KiB) Viewed 1137 times
Could "JS" have meant "Junior Standard" Gram-o-phone, a possible branding that was never pursued given the model's relatively short production life? ***

OrthoFan
***sorry, didn't mean to kill this post string.

User avatar
zipcord
Victor I
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:03 pm
Location: Albany, CA

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by zipcord »

JS Model at Donley
Attachments
313_11.jpg
313_10.jpg
313_9.jpg
313_8.jpg
313_7.jpg
313_6.jpg
313_5.jpg
313_4.jpg
313_3.jpg
313_2.jpg
313_1.jpg

User avatar
Mlund2020
Victor II
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by Mlund2020 »

I believe that is the same one that was offered at Stanton’s this past November. This Berliner JS did not meet reserve at Stanton’s and was passed. It is a very rare and desirable machine but I believe that crank is not correct, the horn and elbow are not original and I think the post may have been replaced also. The reproducer is not the correct rare ‘JS’ reproducer but the more common ‘J’ reproducer found on the Trademark Berliner Improved Gramophones.
Last edited by Mlund2020 on Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shawn
Victor IV
Posts: 1608
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:07 pm
Personal Text: Its only Fun, when we're all having Fun!
Contact:

Re: JS Model on Page 21 of "Look For The Dog"

Post by Shawn »

It certainly does create confusion when models are referred to by their selling price, but it was a common practice for a long time, by many companies (For example, the Edison Amberola 30).

Here is an advertisement from an 1896 Berliner catalog showing what is presumably the "old" model 15 ($15.00 machine). In the the 1898 ad that George posted, the JS is listed as the "New" model 15.
G8.jpg
Subscribe to my music and phonograph videos at https://www.youtube.com/@Shawn_O_Phonograph

Post Reply