This reminds me a lot of that previously uncovered Edison patent and the resentfulness against your findings. A few hundred years earlier you would have been burnt at the stake for blasphemy or witchcraft.Starkton wrote:In 1911, Carl Lindström A.G., Berlin, bought the majority of Fonotipia. Perhaps you don't know that Fonotipia was in British possession since April 1906.
Why do early Columbia Disc records sound bad?
- WDC
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:07 am
Re: Why do early Columbia Disc records sound bad?
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2694
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Why do early Columbia Disc records sound bad?
I am off work today, so I have hopped on, is it me but this thread has appeared to taken a different direction?
- WDC
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:07 am
Re: Why do early Columbia Disc records sound bad?
Your observation is precise, it has drifted a lot. A separate thread would have made sense if others were still willing to discuss it.Victrolacollector wrote:I am off work today, so I have hopped on, is it me but this thread has appeared to taken a different direction?
Btw. I personally quite happy with the sound quality of early Columbia discs.