Page 1 of 1

Victor Record Thickness

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:04 pm
by Victor A
Sorting through records this weekend, I noticed that my Grand Prize labels were somewhat thicker than the patent and batwing labels, and even my one Monarch label record, recorded in '03 and probably produced in '04.

I know having just one of these doesn't make it a really reliable comparison, but the patents and batwing are consistently less thick. Was there a difference in composition, or just a change in the amount of material?

Re: Victor Record Thickness

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:32 pm
by Wolfe
They probably used whatever amount that was needed to set up properly in the record presses in the pressing plant. Composition of shellac unlikely to be causing the difference.

Re: Victor Record Thickness

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:38 pm
by Victor A
Ah, I see. Thanks for the information.

Re: Victor Record Thickness

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 3:36 pm
by edisonplayer
I found that the pre-Dog Monarchs in the 3000 series are thicker than the later Patents and Wing label Victors.edisonplayer

Re: Victor Record Thickness

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 3:39 pm
by Victor A
Mine is in the later 2000 series (2614), so I wonder if that might tell us about when they switched to different pressing machines.