Record Label Transparencies

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
User avatar
Viva-Tonal
Victor II
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Mountain Home, Arkansas USA

Re: Record Label Transparencies

Post by Viva-Tonal »

Do it to it. And welcome to the forum!

User avatar
MordEth
Victor IV
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:01 pm
Personal Text: Contact me for TMF tech support.
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Record Label Transparencies

Post by MordEth »

VictorScroll wrote:I have dozens of unusual labels I can upload,including early 60s South African 78s.
By all means, go for it—I really should get back to cutting out more labels. I didn’t realize they were still making 78s in South Africa in the 60s...

— MordEth

Proudly supporting phonograph discussion boards, hosting phonograph sites and creating phonograph videos since 2007.
Need web hosting or web (or other graphic) design? Support MordEth by using BaseZen Consulting for all of your IT consulting needs.
Want more phonograph discussion? Be sure to visit The Online Edison Phonograph Discussion Board.

User avatar
Viva-Tonal
Victor II
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: Mountain Home, Arkansas USA

Re: Record Label Transparencies

Post by Viva-Tonal »

I believe 1962 is the year they stopped.

Schmaltz
Victor I
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:37 pm
Personal Text: "Shut Your Eyes and See" (J. Joyce)
Location: 80 years behind the times
Contact:

Re: Record Label Transparencies

Post by Schmaltz »

Viva-Tonal wrote:That one's actually mid-late 1940s. I don't think that side was released here, but matrix HCO.2083, 'Hora staccato', was released on Columbia 37207, recorded (in Hollywood) 15 October 1946.
Just looked that up in "BG On Record," and yes that's basically right. The first stateside issue was on a 50s Harmony (#1016).
Visit the virtual jukebox at The Old Schmaltz Archives.

Post Reply