Wobbly US Decca 800, Duke Ellington's CHICAGO version

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2755
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Wobbly US Decca 800, Duke Ellington's CHICAGO version

Post by Wolfe »


User avatar
Inigo
Victor VI
Posts: 3777
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Wobbly US Decca 800, Duke Ellington's CHICAGO version

Post by Inigo »

Yes, I forgot that detail about underlined citations. But sometimes I've found differences among the Rust data and the actual records. This US Decca pressing may be one. The original UK Decca matrix numbers 'GB-6041-1D' are actually there on the runout area of my copy; they are unmistakable, by their stamping style (the small capital letters). They used an original British metal part. And at US Decca they added the -2C identification directly to the stamper, carefully behind the original UK numbers. The typeface of this suffix is typical of early US Decca (curly big typos). Presumably they have several of these imported metal parts, or a mother from which they processed the pressing stampers. :?:
Inigo

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2755
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Wobbly US Decca 800, Duke Ellington's CHICAGO version

Post by Wolfe »

This says for Decca M-438 :

http://www.45worlds.com/78rpm/record/m438

A mx: GB6039-1; B mx: GB6041-2

So now, as per Rust, Chicago IS the 2nd take. But Harlem Speaks is the 1st, which again contradicts Rust for M-438. Pity the runout area of the record in the link is not actually shown. :|

Post Reply