Automatic reproducer volume
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:46 pm
- Location: riverside calif
Automatic reproducer volume
I was playing a cylinder on my standard two latch with a automatic reproducer and I could not get a high volume . I Tried three other automatics and the volume was about the same some a little louder one had less volume... A C- reproducer had higher volume. Are most automatic reproducers low volume or do they need rebuilt. ??? Tom B
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Automatic reproducer volume
They have their own quite severe limitations. Mica Monster came up with a good solution for mine with a reproducer gasket he made.tomb wrote:I was playing a cylinder on my standard two latch with a automatic reproducer and I could not get a high volume . I Tried three other automatics and the volume was about the same some a little louder one had less volume... A C- reproducer had higher volume. Are most automatic reproducers low volume or do they need rebuilt. ??? Tom B
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- WDC
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:07 am
Re: Automatic reproducer volume
Automatic reproducers have a significantly lighter weight than most later reproducers. This is why an Automatic is highly recommended for brown wax cylinders. It is much more gentle to the groove. Because the elliptical doorknob stylus can be quite rough on a record, I usually avoid a C reproducer even on black wax.
Differences within Automatic reproducer series can be also caused by different diaphragms. Even back then, glass diaphragms were made in different grades of thickness, which can make a world of difference. I haven't tried MicaMonster's tuning methods myself yet but he definitely knows what he is doing and has come up with some incredible results on other reproducers as well.
Differences within Automatic reproducer series can be also caused by different diaphragms. Even back then, glass diaphragms were made in different grades of thickness, which can make a world of difference. I haven't tried MicaMonster's tuning methods myself yet but he definitely knows what he is doing and has come up with some incredible results on other reproducers as well.
-
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:46 pm
- Location: riverside calif
Re: Automatic reproducer volume
Thanks for the information. I only have a couple of brown wax which will be played using the automatic reproducer. I was thinking of sending in a couple to Steve Medved for rebuilding. That may increase the output. I am not handy with rebuilding items with small parts any more. TomWDC wrote:Automatic reproducers have a significantly lighter weight than most later reproducers. This is why an Automatic is highly recommended for brown wax cylinders. It is much more gentle to the groove. Because the elliptical doorknob stylus can be quite rough on a record, I usually avoid a C reproducer even on black wax.
Differences within Automatic reproducer series can be also caused by different diaphragms. Even back then, glass diaphragms were made in different grades of thickness, which can make a world of difference. I haven't tried MicaMonster's tuning methods myself yet but he definitely knows what he is doing and has come up with some incredible results on other reproducers as well.