I must admit that I haven't actually heard an external horn gramophone play.
So I wonder, do they sound better than an internal horn gramophone ?
I suppose they generally have earlier sound boxes / Reproducers so may sound better with early acoustic records ?
I also wonder whether wooden external horns are better sounding than external metal horns ?
I think that maybe EMG gramophones can be excluded from this thread as they are considered to be 'beyond reproach' by many people - so thinking about all the others.
Maybe this is a subjective thing ?
Thank you for your opinion though.
Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal ?
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
- AZ*
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:51 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
Answer: It depends. The sound from a Victor V with large horn is generally better than an early Victrola with its small squarish horn.
An internal horn Orthophonic, Viva-Tonal, HMV re-entrant, large Brunswick, etc. or HMV saxophone machine will outperform the external horn machines (excluding Expert/EMG).
If you have a scratchy record, the ability to close the lid on internal machines so equipped will reduce the scratchiness.
I prefer Metal morning glory horns to either straight metal horns or wood horns. Wood horns can soften some of the scratchiness, but they also filter off the midrange. Similar story with metal re-entrant horns vs wood horn Orthophonics.
My 2 cents. YMMV.
An internal horn Orthophonic, Viva-Tonal, HMV re-entrant, large Brunswick, etc. or HMV saxophone machine will outperform the external horn machines (excluding Expert/EMG).
If you have a scratchy record, the ability to close the lid on internal machines so equipped will reduce the scratchiness.
I prefer Metal morning glory horns to either straight metal horns or wood horns. Wood horns can soften some of the scratchiness, but they also filter off the midrange. Similar story with metal re-entrant horns vs wood horn Orthophonics.
My 2 cents. YMMV.
Best regards ... AZ*
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
AZ* wrote:Answer: It depends. The sound from a Victor V with large horn is generally better than an early Victrola with its small squarish horn.
An internal horn Orthophonic, Viva-Tonal, HMV re-entrant, large Brunswick, etc. or HMV saxophone machine will outperform the external horn machines (excluding Expert/EMG).
If you have a scratchy record, the ability to close the lid on internal machines so equipped will reduce the scratchiness.
I prefer Metal morning glory horns to either straight metal horns or wood horns. Wood horns can soften some of the scratchiness, but they also filter off the midrange. Similar story with metal re-entrant horns vs wood horn Orthophonics.
My 2 cents. YMMV.
Ah, I see.
So, generally (apart from EMG/Expert) an internal horn gramophone with a lid that closes has better sound than an external horn gramophone - particularly useful information for me as I like hearing ancient 'scratchy' acoustic records.
Thank you so very much for such a clear and informative response !
Last edited by poodling around on Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3992
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
Lots of variables here.poodling around wrote:I must admit that I haven't actually heard an external horn gramophone play.
So I wonder, do they sound better than an internal horn gramophone ?
I suppose they generally have earlier sound boxes / Reproducers so may sound better with early acoustic records ?
I also wonder whether wooden external horns are better sounding than external metal horns ?
I think that maybe EMG gramophones can be excluded from this thread as they are considered to be 'beyond reproach' by many people - so thinking about all the others.
Maybe this is a subjective thing ?
Thank you for your opinion though.
An outside horn machine can certainly rival Orthophonic or Viva Tonal tabletops with a correctly rebuilt No. 4 soundbox for electrical recordings.
There's no comparison to the large Orthophonic or Viva Tonal machines, though.
A larger outside horn machine like a Victor D, V, VI will give better fidelity because the sound chamber is longer than a I,II,III, or E.
Wood horn vs metal horn is a debate that's totally personal preference. For example, some listeners prefer the wooden horn of a Credenza, others claim metal horns of other Orthophonics sound "brighter". Same with outside horn machines- personally I prefer the oak speartip on my Vic V, but others would prefer the big metal witch's hat. As with everything else, making sure seams are sealed and the horn fits the elbow snugly is crucial, otherwise you'll get unwanted resonance that shouldn't be there.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3992
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
Here's an example of a late reproducer on an early machine. It's my old Vic V. It lives in Cincinnati now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZaOLCxirOs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZaOLCxirOs
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- Mormon S
- Victor III
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 6:27 pm
- Personal Text: Martin "phono_fluff" on instagram
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
In my opinion, internal horns sound better. Most internal horns are wooden, and reverberate the sound to come out warmer. Lids make a huge difference, not only because of surface noise, but also the the noise emitted from the exposed diaphragm. Larger orthophonic style tone chambers give a nice sound stage, emphasize bass, mediate the high frequencies, but can muddy mid frequencies at higher volumes.
Martin
Martin
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
I may misunderstand but I think you say that if the external horn machine has a number 4 sound box then it can rival a tabletop with electric recordings - which of course I do have.gramophone-georg wrote:Lots of variables here.poodling around wrote:I must admit that I haven't actually heard an external horn gramophone play.
So I wonder, do they sound better than an internal horn gramophone ?
I suppose they generally have earlier sound boxes / Reproducers so may sound better with early acoustic records ?
I also wonder whether wooden external horns are better sounding than external metal horns ?
I think that maybe EMG gramophones can be excluded from this thread as they are considered to be 'beyond reproach' by many people - so thinking about all the others.
Maybe this is a subjective thing ?
Thank you for your opinion though.
An outside horn machine can certainly rival Orthophonic or Viva Tonal tabletops with a correctly rebuilt No. 4 soundbox for electrical recordings.
There's no comparison to the large Orthophonic or Viva Tonal machines, though.
A larger outside horn machine like a Victor D, V, VI will give better fidelity because the sound chamber is longer than a I,II,III, or E.
Wood horn vs metal horn is a debate that's totally personal preference. For example, some listeners prefer the wooden horn of a Credenza, others claim metal horns of other Orthophonics sound "brighter". Same with outside horn machines- personally I prefer the oak speartip on my Vic V, but others would prefer the big metal witch's hat. As with everything else, making sure seams are sealed and the horn fits the elbow snugly is crucial, otherwise you'll get unwanted resonance that shouldn't be there.
Wood vs metal horn is personal preference.
Very interesting.
Thank you gramophone-georg
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
Mormon S wrote:In my opinion, internal horns sound better. Most internal horns are wooden, and reverberate the sound to come out warmer. Lids make a huge difference, not only because of surface noise, but also the the noise emitted from the exposed diaphragm. Larger orthophonic style tone chambers give a nice sound stage, emphasize bass, mediate the high frequencies, but can muddy mid frequencies at higher volumes.
Martin
I see. So it seems that internal horn gramophones do indeed tend to sound better. Thank you for giving me the reasoning behind this view as well Martin.
- poodling around
- Victor V
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
gramophone-georg wrote:Here's an example of a late reproducer on an early machine. It's my old Vic V. It lives in Cincinnati now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZaOLCxirOs
Thank you gramophone-georg.
The machine certainly sounds very good with the late reproducer.
- Governor Flyball
- Victor II
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:59 pm
- Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Re: Do external horn gramophones sound better than internal
The later acoustic playback machines (Orthophonic-Vivatonal) uses an extended length horn and gradual exponential throat with larger horn mouth to extend the low frequency cut off. The low frequency extension was also aided by modifying the sound box armature lever stylus to diaphragm ratio. The folded wooden horn in the Orthophonic further help to attenuate the high frequencies.
So to my ears the Orthophonic players sacrificed the high frequencies for the low. Maybe it was not a bad thing as the record surface noise is reduced with a more satisfying bass sound.
As for external vs internal, I think there are many factors here. I look for a longer more slender exponential horn with a larger mouth and a sound box with a low mass larger stiff diaphragm and small mass stylus armature for best sound. Look at the Edison with a 250 horn: I think Edison provided the best overall playback design for both cylinder and disc.
So to my ears the Orthophonic players sacrificed the high frequencies for the low. Maybe it was not a bad thing as the record surface noise is reduced with a more satisfying bass sound.
As for external vs internal, I think there are many factors here. I look for a longer more slender exponential horn with a larger mouth and a sound box with a low mass larger stiff diaphragm and small mass stylus armature for best sound. Look at the Edison with a 250 horn: I think Edison provided the best overall playback design for both cylinder and disc.