Only the earliest 102's had the metal motor board. From the 102B of about 1933, black versions had a polished wood motor board until the post war 102E which had a black cloth covered motor board. With very few exceptions, coloured 102's had matching cloth covered motor boards.nostalgia wrote:Thank you, Roger, for posting the product name you are using to clean your portables. I have been using Swarfega, but sometimes I feel some water may be needed to do a more thorugh clean, but until now I have not dared to use any water. I was not able to find the product you recommend in my area, but will carefully try a leather cleaner. I found a product named Autoglym leather cleaner, and will test it first on a black portable I use for spares, before starting to clean this dark blue portable.
I am not able to take part in the discussion of the frequency range of the 101 vs the 102 at this time, and what portable sound best. When I have been servicing all my portables, hopefully during the upcoming spring/summer, I will spend more time on the soundboxes, testing switching soundboxes etc.
The only thing I can say at the time of writing this, (after having been servicing and disassembled them both) is that I so far somehow feel more attracted to the design and feeling of the 101 portable, than the 102. The 102 has a more bulky design (in particular the later models), and also I feel the introduction of plastic is not exactly something I like. I understand plastic was a big thing when it arrived back then, but in today's world the status of "plastic fantastic"' in production (and general use) is at an all time low. I am neither too happy about the metal motorboard on the 102, compared to the 101 motorboard, where they still kept woodwork around the horn outlet .
Probably the biggest and best horn in any British portable was the bifurcated design fitted to the Decca 120 and 130 models :