Horn shapes

Discussions on Talking Machines of British or European Manufacture
User avatar
emgcr
Victor IV
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:57 am
Location: Hampshire, England.
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by emgcr »

Here is the link to "Modern Gramophones and Electrical Reproducers". (1929). : https://archive.org/details/ModernGramo ... 1/mode/2up

anchorman
Victor II
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Horn shapes

Post by anchorman »

Thanks Graham!

User avatar
Orchorsol
Victor IV
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:03 am
Location: Dover, UK
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by Orchorsol »

Here are the Wilson articles from 1926 (presumably an earlier iteration of his curves than in the Wilson & Webb book).
Attachments
Wilson ARMCHAIR PHONATICS X-XI.pdf
(145.01 KiB) Downloaded 96 times
BCN thorn needles made to the original 1920s specifications: http://www.burmesecolourneedles.com

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe4DNb ... TPE-zTAJGg?

User avatar
Inigo
Victor VI
Posts: 3775
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by Inigo »

Thanks for those interesting articles! ;)
The final note of P Wilson about fibre needles and Parlophone records leans on one of our favourite topics; which records are most of least suitable for fibres. Personally, I've found that all those laminated records are not keen to triangular bamboo needles, producing the infamous effect of burning the shellac. I've always felt that this outer layer of these records which has more shellac percentage is the cause of this burning effect. I've always felt that for triangular bamboos, a bit more abrasive surface works much better, as is the case of non laminated records, as HMV or Victor. In Spain, before 1933, records such as Parlophone, Odeon, Regal (our Columbia branch brand name) were all laminated, and produce such burning effect. After that date, all were absorbed by Gramófono (our EMI branch) and no more laminated records were made.
Only apart from our EMI branch was left our independent Columbia brand, which continued making records also with conventional shellac, but used a much finer material which also produces burning and problems with bamboo needles. In the other hand, they are delicious for playing with modern electrical pickups, and are of overall better sound quality than the EMI products. These were associated with UK Decca from 1943 on, and benefited from that company's recording techniques and equipment. In those, ffrr recording was introduced secretly, but its presence is obvious to the educated ears... They sound incredibly beautiful.
Of course, there are the BCN cactus needles, different from bamboos, and now made and sold by our colleague Orchorsol, which are famous for overcoming all these problems...
Inigo

anchorman
Victor II
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Horn shapes

Post by anchorman »

Interesting to see Wilson talking about the Columbia Plano-reflex horns as though they’re based on sound (pardon the inadvertent pun) principles. Lots of good info in that book!

User avatar
Orchorsol
Victor IV
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:03 am
Location: Dover, UK
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by Orchorsol »

Inigo wrote: Sat Jul 30, 2022 4:13 pm Thanks for those interesting articles! ;)
The final note of P Wilson about fibre needles and Parlophone records leans on one of our favourite topics; which records are most of least suitable for fibres. Personally, I've found that all those laminated records are not keen to triangular bamboo needles, producing the infamous effect of burning the shellac. I've always felt that this outer layer of these records which has more shellac percentage is the cause of this burning effect. I've always felt that for triangular bamboos, a bit more abrasive surface works much better, as is the case of non laminated records, as HMV or Victor. In Spain, before 1933, records such as Parlophone, Odeon, Regal (our Columbia branch brand name) were all laminated, and produce such burning effect. After that date, all were absorbed by Gramófono (our EMI branch) and no more laminated records were made.
Only apart from our EMI branch was left our independent Columbia brand, which continued making records also with conventional shellac, but used a much finer material which also produces burning and problems with bamboo needles. In the other hand, they are delicious for playing with modern electrical pickups, and are of overall better sound quality than the EMI products. These were associated with UK Decca from 1943 on, and benefited from that company's recording techniques and equipment. In those, ffrr recording was introduced secretly, but its presence is obvious to the educated ears... They sound incredibly beautiful.
Of course, there are the BCN cactus needles, different from bamboos, and now made and sold by our colleague Orchorsol, which are famous for overcoming all these problems...
Thank you for the kind words! BCNs can "burn" some records, mostly just some of the US dime store labels and a few mainland European ones, but I did for example once have a problem with a UK Decca test pressing. Ibota wax helps with this problem.

It's curious that Percy Wilson mentions a problem with laminated Parlophones - I've never noticed a problem, nor heard that anywhere else. But maybe bamboo fibre needles cause this problem on a more widespread basis than thorn needles.

(Apologies for thread drift away from horns!)
BCN thorn needles made to the original 1920s specifications: http://www.burmesecolourneedles.com

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe4DNb ... TPE-zTAJGg?

anchorman
Victor II
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Horn shapes

Post by anchorman »

from Mr. Wilson:

"As I have remarked before, there is probably some functional relationship between the length of the horn and the width of the open end which will give the most satisfactory results. We await some bright genius who will show us what that is. In the meantime we can only go on trying and trying and trying.As I have remarked before, there is probably some functional relationship between the length of the horn and the width of the open end which will give the most satisfactory results. We await some bright genius who will show us what that is. In the meantime we can only go on trying and trying and trying."

Have we had a bright genius who has determined what gives the most satisfactory results yet?

User avatar
Marco Gilardetti
Victor IV
Posts: 1398
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:19 am
Personal Text: F. Depero, "Grammofono", 1923.
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by Marco Gilardetti »

Are you joking? Of course yes! The horn loading theory is well known and assessed since many decades.

anchorman
Victor II
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Horn shapes

Post by anchorman »

Only slightly ;)

I’ve progressed in my reading a little bit more, and the book I’m currently studying gets into this a little deeper.

User avatar
emgcr
Victor IV
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:57 am
Location: Hampshire, England.
Contact:

Re: Horn shapes

Post by emgcr »

The definitive book on the subject is : "High-quality horn loudspeaker systems" by Bjørn Kolbrek and Thomas Dunker published in 2019. ISBN : 978-1-5272-4542-6. It is an expensive, but very good value, publication running to over one thousand pages and currently seems to be hard to find on the open market. It could still be available from Parts Express or local libraries.

https://www.parts-express.com/High-Qual ... ms-500-032

Apologies that two of the images are sideways but click on them to make vertical ! Click on any image to enlarge.
Attachments
DSC08951.JPG
DSC06332.JPG
DSC06331.JPG
DSC06330.JPG

Post Reply