No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Discussions on Talking Machines of British or European Manufacture
Post Reply
EdgarFB
Victor O
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:44 pm

No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Post by EdgarFB »

I have a 1940 hmv 102 (date code B4) and a 1939 (code B3) both just have “102” as the model type, not as I’d expect 102c or possibly 102d… did they ditch the letter suffix during the war?

User avatar
Inigo
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4107
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Post by Inigo »

My B/9 from 1945, MOS unit, is a 102 D
IMG20240617182944.jpg
Inigo

EdgarFB
Victor O
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:44 pm

Re: No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Post by EdgarFB »

Inigo wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2024 12:31 pm My B/9 from 1945, MOS unit, is a 102 D
IMG20240617182944.jpg
Yes I have a 1945 MOS also stamped with a D. But absolutely no letter stamped on either of my war time civilian 102s. Just "102"

Image
Image

User avatar
Inigo
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4107
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Post by Inigo »

The D in mine seems to be a later addition, using an earlier ivorine plate, so maybe they were using id plates from remaining stock, maybe it was because of the war, or because these were for MOS. Clearly there were earlier ivorines with the letters C or D properly stamped. As I've seen all these in a fast Google search:
Attachments
794sg1g5gnn71.jpg
IMG_20240618_204319.jpg
IMG_20240618_204319.jpg (25.54 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204355.jpg
IMG_20240618_204355.jpg (43.52 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204410.jpg
IMG_20240618_204410.jpg (50.28 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204428.jpg
IMG_20240618_204428.jpg (60.4 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204447.jpg
IMG_20240618_204447.jpg (31.83 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204502.jpg
IMG_20240618_204502.jpg (54.5 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204521.jpg
IMG_20240618_204521.jpg (45.72 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204538.jpg
IMG_20240618_204538.jpg (96.16 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204555.jpg
IMG_20240618_204555.jpg (56.22 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
IMG_20240618_204616.jpg
IMG_20240618_204616.jpg (88.31 KiB) Viewed 1365 times
Inigo

EdgarFB
Victor O
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:44 pm

Re: No model suffix letter on my wartime 102s, do I assume they are “C” or “D”?

Post by EdgarFB »

Inigo wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2024 2:31 pm The D in mine seems to be a later addition, using an earlier ivorine plate, so maybe they were using id plates from remaining stock, maybe it was because of the war, or because these were for MOS. Clearly there were earlier ivorines with the letters C or D properly stamped. As I've seen all these in a fast Google search:
Interesting that the 1939 you found there also doesn't have a letter. So what physical characteristics actually make a machine a model "C" or "D"? .... I'm wondering if during the early war years they weren't able to consistently manufacture the machines to C or D spec due to recycling older parts from earlier iterations, so they just labeled them without the revision letter. Could be early wartime machines weren't technically Cs so weren't labelled as such?

Is there a good resource on what updates to the design actually made the difference between a B, C and D?

Post Reply