Seen this on ebay. Anybody know how these things sound? At $150 it seems like a decent deal to me.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/SONORA-ORTHOPH ... SwMxxc~SBY
Sonora Orthophonic
- travisgreyfox
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:25 pm
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 4:02 pm
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
Check out his youtube link. The machine sounds real nice.
Stetam
Stetam
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:39 am
- Personal Text: I've got both kinds of music--classical & rag-time.
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
The condition is amazing and would be a good buy even if it were equipped with conventional pre-'25 tonearm.
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
Is the "Super Fine" sound box equipped with the mica diaphragm original to this model, or is it a replacement, culled from an earlier model, for the Sonora "Tonalic" sound box? According to Joe Wakeman's Sonora book, it should have the new style reproducer equipped with an aluminum diaphragm, etc..
OrthoFan
OrthoFan
- AZ*
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:51 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
The soundbox is a Super Fine and has a mica diaphragm as shown in ebay listing.
Best regards ... AZ*
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
I looked over my question and see I didn't word it very well. What I was wondering was, is the Super Fine sound box the correct one for this model, or should it have a Tonalic sound box like the larger Tonalic models?AZ* wrote:The soundbox is a Super Fine and has a mica diaphragm as shown in ebay listing.
I haven't come across very many Sonora Phonographs from the late 1920s, and most of those I've seen did not have their original reproducers. Apparently, as with other pot metal sound boxes, they were prone to disintegrate with time.
OrthoFan
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:14 pm
- Location: Plainfield, NJ
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
I acquired this machine from the eBay auction. It did have the Super Fine soundbox but I replaced it with a No. 5 that I have. The gasket on the No. 5 is new and not an exact match to the original, but the tonearm does appear to be designed to mount the Tonalic reproducer. The result can be heard here — https://youtu.be/opInGRD0yW4.
Bill
Bill
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
No. 5, as in Sonora No. 5? -- http://forum.talkingmachine.info/viewto ... =2&t=13601BillH_NJ wrote:I acquired this machine from the eBay auction. It did have the Super Fine soundbox but I replaced it with a No. 5 that I have. The gasket on the No. 5 is new and not an exact match to the original, but the tonearm does appear to be designed to mount the Tonalic reproducer. The result can be heard here — https://youtu.be/opInGRD0yW4.
Bill
Judging from the video, it sounds pretty good; similar to a Victor Consolette.
OrthoFan
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:14 pm
- Location: Plainfield, NJ
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
Yes, a Sonora No. 5. Pot metal back is in decent shape although the diaphragm has a couple of dents.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:39 am
- Personal Text: I've got both kinds of music--classical & rag-time.
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Sonora Orthophonic
The machine sounds very nice--still has the mica-diaphragm sound that we associate with a 1920s phonograph but with the lid closed it really does put out. A nicely designed phonograph, and worthy of any collection--well worth shoehorning in there behind that Grafonola, like you did!
I love the test record too. Wouldn't it be nice if Gilbert & Sullivan records were more common?
I love the test record too. Wouldn't it be nice if Gilbert & Sullivan records were more common?