Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post links to auctions and classifieds here
User avatar
fmblizz
Victor IV
Posts: 1176
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: South Jersey

Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by fmblizz »


User avatar
Roaring20s
Victor V
Posts: 2567
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by Roaring20s »

Wow! A very nice image!

James.
s-l1600.jpg
Screen Shot 2020-09-22 at 4.05.25 PM.png

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by gramophone78 »

Actually, the image is in reverse. This is correct.... Why is there a circle on his finger...??. In my opinion, I don't think it's Berliner, Bell or Edison in the photo... :lol:
s-l1600.jpg

User avatar
TinfoilPhono
Victor IV
Posts: 1926
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:48 pm
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif.

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by TinfoilPhono »

Tintypes are always laterally inverted. It's the nature of the beast since they are positive images. There's no negative so the plate you see was the one that was inside the camera when the picture was taken. It received light through the lens directly, so it was 'struck' in reverse.

The seller put the circle around the ring to highlight it, thinking that it was significant that the person in the photo had a (presumably) expensive ring.

I agree that it doesn't look like Berliner. But it's a very rare image, all the more so given that tintypes went out of fashion in the 1880s with the introduction of gelatin silver dry plates. Tintypes from the 1890s are much more unusual than those from the 1850s-1870s.

Garret
Victor IV
Posts: 1523
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Lille, France

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by Garret »

There's a real resemblance in an image I found here of Berliner, but something about the nose just isn't quite there: https://bit.ly/33SKihe

User avatar
Roaring20s
Victor V
Posts: 2567
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:55 am
Personal Text: Those who were seen dancing were thought insane by those who could not hear the music. Nietzsche
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by Roaring20s »

Screen Shot 2020-09-22 at 11.31.41 PM.png

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by gramophone78 »

Not to mention some of the other tintypes sold by the seller are of the same man and at the same location.

soundgen
Victor VI
Posts: 3001
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by soundgen »

gramophone78 wrote:Not to mention some of the other tintypes sold by the seller are of the same man and at the same location.
Thee are hundreds of repro tin types out there and they make them to order and it must be pretty easy to age them

https://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?item=25 ... =600&rt=nc

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by gramophone78 »

soundgen wrote:
gramophone78 wrote:Not to mention some of the other tintypes sold by the seller are of the same man and at the same location.
Thee are hundreds of repro tintypes out there and they make them to order and it must be pretty easy to age them

https://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?item=25 ... =600&rt=nc
Of course I'm not implying the seller is or has sold repro tintypes. Just an observation the same man is in serval shots that were sold.

User avatar
fmblizz
Victor IV
Posts: 1176
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: South Jersey

Re: Emile Berliner w/ Gramophone Tintype on Ebay

Post by fmblizz »

Am I missing something... I fail to see where the seller has listed any tintype in the past???

blizz

Post Reply