Soundbox/reproducer = same thing. Victor used one name other companies the other name ... can't remember which is which ... The main difference is othophonic vs the older style ... and the main difference was older types used a thin sheet of mica and othophonic used a thin sheet of aluminum [I am oversimplifying on purpose ... there is way more to it than that]. Orthophonics are WAY, WAY tougher to work on or rebuild than the mica type. And Victor orthophonics are the worst by far because they used a setup using tiny ball bearings around the needlebar.MarkH wrote:Hi guys,
Is my VV 2-55 soundbox a No 5? And is a soundbox the same thing as a reproducer (that is, the round unit that holds the record needle that has a diaphragm)? Why are soundboxes named Number 1, Number 2,..., No 5? At first, I was thinking a "soundbox" was the area where the sound was pumped into...like a subwoofer box, but I think I'm wrong with that assumption.
I'm still struggling a bit with all the terms; and I'm sorry if this question is so basic to you all, but I really appreciate this forum in helping a new guy!
And thanks to Jeb98 for the links!
Mark
I had rebuild a couple of motors and couple mica types before I tackled a Victor orthophonic.
It was ... hard ... very, very, very hard!
I did it, but it was hard ... did I mention it was hard?
I basically ended up trashing the original and using the parts to make one using a new case from Ron Sitko.
It sounds great, I was very pleased I'd done it and would very much hesitate to do it again.
The whole ordeal can be seen here:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=30036&start=0
But others have done work on your machine's reproducer which can be seen here
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21206
and here
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22081
Whether yours needs a full tear down is hard to say however. Maybe more pictures of it off the arm and close up would help [back and front].
Cheers