Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
rodpickett
Victor II
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:30 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by rodpickett »

This link to a 13 October 2013 was just sent to me. I am NOT the buyer of this record.

http://www.fuse.tv/2013/10/why-i-paid-3 ... one-record

Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Phonofreak »

Thank you for posting this link. I heard about it, too. Add 1,000 to the price of the record, That's what I paid for my house back in 1990. Wow, that sure is something. I watched the video of the recording, and it was very good, but not $37,100 worth. I can watch the video, and save myself all that money.
Harvey Kravitz

Rastus10
Victor I
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 12:24 pm

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Rastus10 »

Interesting article.

Numerically speaking, how many "holy grails" of sound recording are there? As many as there are fragments of the "True Cross" lurking about?

User avatar
VintageTechnologies
Victor IV
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by VintageTechnologies »

Rastus10 wrote:Interesting article.

Numerically speaking, how many "holy grails" of sound recording are there? As many as there are fragments of the "True Cross" lurking about?
You'd have to ask Mark Twain about relics such as that. In fact, my idea of a holy grail would be a recording of Mark Twain. I read that Bettini made a recording of Twain, but later took it to France where it was destroyed during WW1. Of all public figures living since the invention of the phonograph, why oh why, didn't Twain make commercial recordings?

Victrolacollector
Victor V
Posts: 2708
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Victrolacollector »

Yes that is a nice record, and I have never seen an actual Paramount label in my life. However, my finances would never allow me to pay that much for a record. I look at it that I could have many machines and records for that amount. Also, I wonder if the resale is even worth it, could take a loss, but may make a gain, you never know.

User avatar
Dave
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:50 pm
Personal Text: Gramophonist
Location: KY.

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Dave »

Victrolacollector wrote:I look at it that I could have many machines and records for that amount.
I was just thinking the same thing...A housefull of nice machines and plenty of recordings to play...
But if that recording was my "White Whale" and I was "Ahab"...i could easily understand the reasoning for
wanting to desperately aquire it.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Wolfe »

Victrolacollector wrote: Also, I wonder if the resale is even worth it, could take a loss, but may make a gain, you never know.
It could be viewed as an investment. There's deep pocket collectors all over the globe that seek records like this. Plus I'm sure Tefteller could sell a few nuggets from his existing collection to finance such a thing as this record.

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6466
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by JerryVan »

How much do you suppose Tommy Johnson got for cutting that record? Maybe $5?

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by Wolfe »

More than that I would think.

Those Paramount artists might get something like 30 bucks a side. Depending on how popular they were.

User avatar
johannes
Victor O
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:17 pm

Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record

Post by johannes »

Thanks for posting. I really enjoyed the accompanying story too

Post Reply