It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare!kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea
Target practice with 78s better for the environment?
- Norfolkguy
- Victor O
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:27 am
- Personal Text: Love, life, and people...well, the nice ones!
- Location: Shiloh NC.
Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?
- kirtley2012
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1580
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm
- Personal Text: Buyer of broken things
- Location: North Shields, UK
- Contact:
Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?
yes, and theres a scratch on the record where billy fury accidentally slid his soundbox over it, certainly it should be $15,000Norfolkguy wrote:It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare!kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea
- Norfolkguy
- Victor O
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:27 am
- Personal Text: Love, life, and people...well, the nice ones!
- Location: Shiloh NC.
Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?
At least! Being so shiny and all..... Ah ebay, hope spring eternal!kirtley2012 wrote:yes, and theres a scratch on the record where billy fury accidentally slid his soundbox over it, certainly it should be $15,000Norfolkguy wrote:It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare!kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea