Strange Victor label variant

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor VI
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Strange Victor label variant

Post by gramophone-georg »

In 50 plus years of collecting, this is the first time I've seen this particular label design. In fact, this entire RECORD is strange. An actual U.S. Victor Batwing, (not a Canadian one), but with the two lines of print from the 1938- mid 41 gold print "non- commercial" verbiage where the "VTMC" info should go, and "RCA MANUFACTURING CO., INC" outside the label border.

To further confuse things... this isn't the 1923-mid 31 eccentric groove, it's the mid- 1931- 40 design with a lead in to the double eccentric. No lead in groove at the rim... no VE stamp, either- it's acoustic! Let me update that- A side DOES have a very faint outer rim lead-in groove... and it's NOT an "add-on" lead in groove like some of the 1940s repressings of 1920s Orthophonics that abruptly scoops the needle into an existing groove... it leads in like a later Victor record of te late 30s.

Did they actually dub early acoustic recordings like these "Gem" series? And why the special Batwing label? Why not just use the label type currently being used like other dubbed recordings and repressings?

Yeah, I guess I am showing my "record geek" tendencies. Somewhere I have a Victor record collector's book, but I can't find it and don't recall seeing this in it.

Any help? This is the kind of stupid stuff that keeps me awake nights. :lol:
Attachments
IMG_7594.JPG
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
Inigo
Victor VI
Posts: 3753
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by Inigo »

Joining there two first things, it narrows the pressing to the 1938-40 period.
Then the strange thing is that they used the old battering style instead of the current circle design. Maybe it was a special nostalgic edition...
The still good lettering also points to pre-1941 pressing.
Inigo

User avatar
ChesterCheetah18
Victor II
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:16 pm

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by ChesterCheetah18 »

George, from one "record geek" to another, that's very interesting. Mr. Sherman's book (2nd ed. pg. 112) does discuss that label variant. It appears that RCA Victor was using that label in the early '40s for the very few acoustic records they were still pressing for special order. He also has a photo of a "scarce 1943 pressing" of the same record, although the font is different from yours. I'm guessing it's a rather rare, and interesting variant.

Steve

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor VI
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by gramophone-georg »

ChesterCheetah18 wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:12 am George, from one "record geek" to another, that's very interesting. Mr. Sherman's book (2nd ed. pg. 112) does discuss that label variant. It appears that RCA Victor was using that label in the early '40s for the very few acoustic records they were still pressing for special order. He also has a photo of a "scarce 1943 pressing" of the same record, although the font is different from yours. I'm guessing it's a rather rare, and interesting variant.

Steve
Thanks Steve- wish I could find my copy of that damn book... :oops:
Interesting that Sherman references a scarce 1943 pressing- the gold print was long gone by then I'd think.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor VI
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by gramophone-georg »

Inigo- Agree!
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
ChesterCheetah18
Victor II
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:16 pm

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by ChesterCheetah18 »

gramophone-georg wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 3:15 pm
ChesterCheetah18 wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:12 am George, from one "record geek" to another, that's very interesting. Mr. Sherman's book (2nd ed. pg. 112) does discuss that label variant. It appears that RCA Victor was using that label in the early '40s for the very few acoustic records they were still pressing for special order. He also has a photo of a "scarce 1943 pressing" of the same record, although the font is different from yours. I'm guessing it's a rather rare, and interesting variant.

Steve
Thanks Steve- wish I could find my copy of that damn book... :oops:
Interesting that Sherman references a scarce 1943 pressing- the gold print was long gone by then I'd think.
It can be a bit of a conundrum at times, but that to me is half the fun, George. Again, digging into Mr. Sherman's book, I think your copy was pressed prior to late '41. It still has the 1635744 patent number, which was dropped in late '41. The lettering is more vague. In the book, he indicates that "gold" lettering was used from fall of '37 to mid '41, and "brass" lettering used from late '41 to fall of '43. I was always under the impression the silver lettering was introduced shortly before, or just after the end of The War.

Steve

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor VI
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by gramophone-georg »

ChesterCheetah18 wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 6:14 pm
gramophone-georg wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 3:15 pm
ChesterCheetah18 wrote: Sat May 07, 2022 11:12 am George, from one "record geek" to another, that's very interesting. Mr. Sherman's book (2nd ed. pg. 112) does discuss that label variant. It appears that RCA Victor was using that label in the early '40s for the very few acoustic records they were still pressing for special order. He also has a photo of a "scarce 1943 pressing" of the same record, although the font is different from yours. I'm guessing it's a rather rare, and interesting variant.

Steve
Thanks Steve- wish I could find my copy of that damn book... :oops:
Interesting that Sherman references a scarce 1943 pressing- the gold print was long gone by then I'd think.
It can be a bit of a conundrum at times, but that to me is half the fun, George. Again, digging into Mr. Sherman's book, I think your copy was pressed prior to late '41. It still has the 1635744 patent number, which was dropped in late '41. The lettering is more vague. In the book, he indicates that "gold" lettering was used from fall of '37 to mid '41, and "brass" lettering used from late '41 to fall of '43. I was always under the impression the silver lettering was introduced shortly before, or just after the end of The War.

Steve
Gold lettering seems to have ended somewhere between 27483 and 27500 in the popular series- sometime in late May 1941, and at about the same time for Red Seals. At first, the replacement lettering appeared as a greenish silver but soon morphed to pure silver. I've not seen anything that resembles "brass". It seems the 1635744 patent number was gone by July, and "Victor Needles" was replaced by "RCA Victor Needles" sometime in there as well.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

User avatar
Governor Flyball
Victor II
Posts: 251
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 8:59 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by Governor Flyball »

35386 was recorded in 1914. When the first run out groove was introduced in 1923, you could see how Victor must have cut the groove in the original master. I suspect a daughter pressing had the run out groove added from which the stamper was made.

It looks to me the same process was done to a later daughter pressing in which the later run out was added. The key is to look closely where the run out begins and look for the mating cut. Further evidence it is direct from the master is when the musical selection finishes. Victor generally let the cutter continue in silence for about 8 revolutions. If this records spins an extended time in silence before the run out, that nails it.

A dub of this standard selection would have lost noticable fidelity even by 1940. Hence going back to the master remained necessary. I have an early '50's copy of the 1907 Caruso Vesti la Guibba originally on 88061 and from 1923 on 6000A. The '50's 6000A is clearly a dub detected just by listening to it.

Note that the vinyl Heritage Series of the late '40's included a number of acoustic masters with the later spiral run out and run in grooves added.

dennis
Victor I
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by dennis »

Not really sure it applies here, but didn’t the Victor dubs from around 1920 have “s/8” pressed into the dead wax?

User avatar
msherman
Victor O
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:11 am

Re: Strange Victor label variant

Post by msherman »

Not sure what I can add here to what's already been said, or what I have written in my book, but Victor did use the old batwing style label, or "acoustic circle" as they called it to records sold in the late 30s and early 40s that had been recorded acoustically. Here is an interesting pair - originally recorded 21 Nov 1918, it appeared in Victor's catalogs through 1940. Most records recorded during this period were out of the catalog by 1924, or 1926-27 at the latest. I suppose they saw no need to re-record "Turkey in the Straw" electrically on an accordion. Kinda sounds more like an Edison title anyway... ;)
Attachments
Turkey.jpg

Post Reply