Page 1 of 2
Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:42 am
by rodpickett
This link to a 13 October 2013 was just sent to me.
I am NOT the buyer of this record.
http://www.fuse.tv/2013/10/why-i-paid-3 ... one-record
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:32 pm
by Phonofreak
Thank you for posting this link. I heard about it, too. Add 1,000 to the price of the record, That's what I paid for my house back in 1990. Wow, that sure is something. I watched the video of the recording, and it was very good, but not $37,100 worth. I can watch the video, and save myself all that money.
Harvey Kravitz
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:36 pm
by Rastus10
Interesting article.
Numerically speaking, how many "holy grails" of sound recording are there? As many as there are fragments of the "True Cross" lurking about?
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:29 pm
by VintageTechnologies
Rastus10 wrote:Interesting article.
Numerically speaking, how many "holy grails" of sound recording are there? As many as there are fragments of the "True Cross" lurking about?
You'd have to ask Mark Twain about relics such as that. In fact, my idea of a holy grail would be a recording of Mark Twain.
I read that Bettini made a recording of Twain, but later took it to France where it was destroyed during WW1. Of all public figures living since the invention of the phonograph,
why oh
why, didn't Twain make commercial recordings?
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:24 pm
by Victrolacollector
Yes that is a nice record, and I have never seen an actual Paramount label in my life. However, my finances would never allow me to pay that much for a record. I look at it that I could have many machines and records for that amount. Also, I wonder if the resale is even worth it, could take a loss, but may make a gain, you never know.
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:10 pm
by Dave
Victrolacollector wrote:I look at it that I could have many machines and records for that amount.
I was just thinking the same thing...A housefull of nice machines and plenty of recordings to play...
But if that recording was my "White Whale" and
I was "Ahab"...
i could easily understand the reasoning for
wanting to desperately aquire it.
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:22 pm
by Wolfe
Victrolacollector wrote: Also, I wonder if the resale is even worth it, could take a loss, but may make a gain, you never know.
It could be viewed as an investment. There's deep pocket collectors all over the globe that seek records like this. Plus
I'm sure Tefteller could sell a few nuggets from his existing collection to finance such a thing as this record.
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:23 pm
by JerryVan
How much do you suppose Tommy Johnson got for cutting that record? Maybe $5?
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:28 pm
by Wolfe
More than that I would think.
Those Paramount artists might get something like 30 bucks a side. Depending on how popular they were.
Re: Why I Paid $37,100 for One Record
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:09 am
by johannes
Thanks for posting. I really enjoyed the accompanying story too