Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
CDBPDX
Victor V
Posts: 2006
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:43 am
Personal Text: A Hobbyist Specializing in Sales and Repair of Spring Motor Phonographs
Location: Castle Rock, WA
Contact:

Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Post by CDBPDX »

Here is a large 2 page ad in the Saturday Evening Post dated Sep 14, 1912 offering the new Columbia Eclipse. Large images are posted online at:

http://pdx78s.cdbpdx.com/CETT/tn-1500_CETTAD_01.JPG
http://pdx78s.cdbpdx.com/CETT/tn-1500_CETTAD_02.JPG

Note the reproducer, a Concert??

Interesting that is offer includes the double sided demonstration record free "beginning with the day of issue of this Saturday Evening Post and continuing for 30 days"

Cliff
Attachments
tn-700_tn-1500_CETTAD_01.jpg
tn-700_tn-1500_CETTAD_01.jpg (372.6 KiB) Viewed 880 times
tn-700_tn-1500_CETTAD_02.jpg
tn-700_tn-1500_CETTAD_02.jpg (338.95 KiB) Viewed 880 times
Cliff's Vintage Music Shoppe, Castle Rock, WA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIz_IpaVrW8

Online
Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Post by Phonofreak »

Nice ad. This is the early Eclipse with the one piece nickle plated brass tone arm, and a 10" turntable. Yes, that is a Columbia Concert reproducer. I like these early Grafonolas because they still use outside horn parts, and no pot metal.
Harvey Kravitz

Victrolacollector
Victor V
Posts: 2711
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;

Re: Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Post by Victrolacollector »

Didn't they use what they called the "Analyzing Reproducer", did this have a mica or aluminum diaphragm?

Online
Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Post by Phonofreak »

The Analyzing reproducer is the early one that used the spring loaded clamp. The earliest ones had a thumbscrew until Victor sued Columbia over the patent. The Columbia Concert used either Mica or a pleated Aluminum diaphragm. I have seen them both ways.
Harvey Kravitz

User avatar
De Soto Frank
Victor V
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania

Re: Columbia 'Eclipse' Ad Sep 14, 1912

Post by De Soto Frank »

I'll defer to Harvey on Columbia taxonomy, but Columbia seemed to transition through overlapping uses of tone-arms and reproducers...

The Analyzing reproducers I've seen, mounted to the tone-arm via three screws, from the arm into the backside of the reproducer head.

When Columbia came-out with the "Concert" and #5 reproducers, there were versions that also mounted via three screws from the back-side, but there was also an adapter flange with the first version of the bayonet-hub on one side, and a round flange drilled and tapped to accept three machine screws, but these were staggered "out of clock" with the screw-holes for the reproducer... in-between was a special rubber isolator, with six holes moulded into it, three to attach the isolator to the reproducer, and the other three to mount the isolator to the tone-arm.

I have / have seen Concert and # 5 Columbia reproducers set-up this way.

By about 1912 or 13, Columbia was casting reproducer bodies with an integral bayonet hub.


Also, the first-generation bayonet hub / receiver are slightly smaller than the later ones... later reproducers are a VERY tight fit in the early tone-arms ( as in, don't try it - the early arms are thin sheet-brass, "wrapped", and butt-soldered. Fragile`, as the Old Man would say).

A local phonograph buddy has two Eclipses, both slightly later than this ad version, one in oak, and the other in mahogany.
De Soto Frank

Post Reply