Its my intention to incorporate a hollow 360 degree plastic ball joint swivel at the end of the tonearm where it attaches to the soundbox so that offset angle can adjusted as need be when the time comes for optimum tracking. This allows me to ignore offset angle and concentrate on establishing optimum tonearm length to the exclusion of all other parameters with the possible exception of needle overhang which obviously can be established once I know the length of the tonearm. Therefore as a thought exercise, is it fair to say that 3 inches is a little too short no matter the offset angle due to the tight circle described by same? And if 3 inches is too short, what length is practically optimum? I notice that modern tonearms are all over 9 inches yet I have 5 gramophone tonearms all of which are shorter than 8.5 inches. One is only 7 inches long. Obviously the biggest issue with longer tonearms is mass but ignoring that I know there must be a sweet spot. Some length where the benefits of extra length are not outweighed by the practical considerations of space etc. To me establishing optimum conditions are achieved in the following order.jamiegramo wrote:they introduced the offset angle, as mentioned previously, this is a tilt of the soundbox to the length of the tonearm, The tilt angle will vary depending on tonearm length and position.
1 tonearm length
2 needle overhang
3 offset angle
Establishing offset angle and needle overhang prior to tonearm length makes no sense to me. Its like putting the cart before the horse.