HMV 102 record Trays

Discussions on Talking Machines of British or European Manufacture
Post Reply
User avatar
poodling around
Victor V
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am

HMV 102 record Trays

Post by poodling around »

I think that some HMV 102 record trays have what are called 'lugs' and some don't.

Are they used on different 'era' machines ? What is the difference :?:

soundgen
Victor VI
Posts: 3001
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:04 pm
Contact:

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by soundgen »

poodling around wrote:I think that some HMV 102 record trays have what are called 'lugs' and some don't.

Are they used on different 'era' machines ? What is the difference :?:

Early 102 trays had feet ( lugs )so that the tray didn't rotate , to this end the motor board had two studs to stop the tray from spinning later machines without the studs had trays with no feet , during the war trays were discontinued due to metal shortages
Attachments
gramophones.hmv.102.green.JPG
gramophones.hmv.102a.JPG

User avatar
poodling around
Victor V
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by poodling around »

soundgen wrote:
poodling around wrote:I think that some HMV 102 record trays have what are called 'lugs' and some don't.

Are they used on different 'era' machines ? What is the difference :?:

Early 102 trays had feet ( lugs )so that the tray didn't rotate , to this end the motor board had two studs to stop the tray from spinning later machines without the studs had trays with no feet , during the war trays were discontinued due to metal shortages
Thank you soundgen.

So, were the feet no longer required because of some gramophone design change or did those later ones without feet just spin around when the gramophone was transported ?

soundgen
Victor VI
Posts: 3001
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:04 pm
Contact:

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by soundgen »

poodling around wrote:
soundgen wrote:
poodling around wrote:I think that some HMV 102 record trays have what are called 'lugs' and some don't.

Are they used on different 'era' machines ? What is the difference :?:

Early 102 trays had feet ( lugs )so that the tray didn't rotate , to this end the motor board had two studs to stop the tray from spinning later machines without the studs had trays with no feet , during the war trays were discontinued due to metal shortages
Thank you soundgen.

So, were the feet no longer required because of some gramophone design change or did those later ones without feet just spin around when the gramophone was transported ?
The first machines only had the automatic brake which I guess may have disengaged when carrying ?

User avatar
poodling around
Victor V
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by poodling around »

That makes sense and it's something I never would have thought of.

Very interesting indeed and thank you again soundgen !

Phono48
Victor IV
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by Phono48 »

poodling around wrote:So, were the feet no longer required because of some gramophone design change or did those later ones without feet just spin around when the gramophone was transported ?
Yes the later ones did just "spin around" when the machine was carried, but because the two curved "upstands" were heavier, the whole thing only spun to a vertical position within the case. The carrier couldn't fall off, because the lid almost touched the sides of it. When we say "spin", that doesn't mean the turntable was going round, the brakes stayed engaged in all cases. It simply means the carrier moving rotating on the centre spindle.

User avatar
poodling around
Victor V
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 am

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by poodling around »

Phono48 wrote:
poodling around wrote:So, were the feet no longer required because of some gramophone design change or did those later ones without feet just spin around when the gramophone was transported ?
Yes the later ones did just "spin around" when the machine was carried, but because the two curved "upstands" were heavier, the whole thing only spun to a vertical position within the case. The carrier couldn't fall off, because the lid almost touched the sides of it. When we say "spin", that doesn't mean the turntable was going round, the brakes stayed engaged in all cases. It simply means the carrier moving rotating on the centre spindle.
Aha ! I see.

Thank you very much Phono48.

soundgen
Victor VI
Posts: 3001
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:04 pm
Contact:

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by soundgen »

Phono48 wrote:
poodling around wrote:So, were the feet no longer required because of some gramophone design change or did those later ones without feet just spin around when the gramophone was transported ?
Yes the later ones did just "spin around" when the machine was carried, but because the two curved "upstands" were heavier, the whole thing only spun to a vertical position within the case. The carrier couldn't fall off, because the lid almost touched the sides of it. When we say "spin", that doesn't mean the turntable was going round, the brakes stayed engaged in all cases. It simply means the carrier moving rotating on the centre spindle.

"the brakes stayed engaged in all cases" So what was the point of the legs and studs ?

Phono48
Victor IV
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: HMV 102 record Trays

Post by Phono48 »

soundgen wrote: So what was the point of the legs and studs ?
To stop the carrier full of records spinning on the centre spindle, and marking the lid!

Post Reply