https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/95 ... phonograph
You don't see these too often, I love mine.
Nice 10-35 at Stantons
-
- Victor III
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 5:40 pm
- Personal Text: Greg
- Location: Central Maryland
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3984
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
Agree, my 10-35 is one of my favorites!GregVTLA wrote:https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/95 ... phonograph
You don't see these too often, I love mine.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:35 pm
- Location: Syracuse N.Y.
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
Are there any potential pot metal nasties laying in ambush ? Or was pot metal not used in this machine? And any idea of how shippable this is, weight wise ? MANY THANKS for any info !!
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3984
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
There was a first design and a second design to this machine. The first design was sort of a disaster and was recalled. This looks like a second design from what I can see but we really need more pics to be sure.
The mechanism is quite robust, but very complicated and quite difficult to adjust properly if out of whack.
If I had to guess on weight, I'd say maybe 100-150 lbs. Just a guess, though.
The mechanism is quite robust, but very complicated and quite difficult to adjust properly if out of whack.
If I had to guess on weight, I'd say maybe 100-150 lbs. Just a guess, though.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
-
- Victor I
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:27 pm
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
Any ideas anyone on what the shiny metal, heavily bolted, reproducer is? I don't think I ever remember seeing one like it.
Kurt M
Tacoma WA
Kurt M
Tacoma WA
-
- Victor Jr
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Western North Carolina
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
I am pretty sure that machine belonged to Greg Bogantz. Greg wanted to see if he could develop a better orthophonic reproducer using only materials available in 1925. He made a number of prototypes. I visited him a number of times and he demoed those reproducers for me. I believe that is what you are seeing in the photo.jukejunkie wrote:Any ideas anyone on what the shiny metal, heavily bolted, reproducer is? I don't think I ever remember seeing one like it.
Kurt M
Tacoma WA
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:35 pm
- Location: Syracuse N.Y.
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
gramophone-georg wrote:There was a first design and a second design to this machine. The first design was sort of a disaster and was recalled. This looks like a second design from what I can see but we really need more pics to be sure.
The mechanism is quite robust, but very complicated and quite difficult to adjust properly if out of whack.
If I had to guess on weight, I'd say maybe 100-150 lbs. Just a guess, though.
Thank You, George !
-
- Victor III
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 5:40 pm
- Personal Text: Greg
- Location: Central Maryland
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
No fragile pot metal that I noticed going through mine, and for price to ship I'd have to guess around $200. Could get pretty expensive to ship, but this is one of my favorite machines and I'm sure you'd enjoy it.pallophotophone wrote:Are there any potential pot metal nasties laying in ambush ? Or was pot metal not used in this machine? And any idea of how shippable this is, weight wise ? MANY THANKS for any info !!
Last edited by GregVTLA on Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:35 pm
- Location: Syracuse N.Y.
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
GregVTLA wrote:No fragile pot metal that I noticed going through mine, and for weight I'd have to guess around $200. Could get pretty expensive to ship, but this is one of my favorite machines and I'm sure you'd enjoy it.pallophotophone wrote:Are there any potential pot metal nasties laying in ambush ? Or was pot metal not used in this machine? And any idea of how shippable this is, weight wise ? MANY THANKS for any info !!
Hat's in the ring ! I've always wanted an orthophonic with a metal horn. Maybe it's my time.
Many Thanks !!
- gramophone-georg
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3984
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Nice 10-35 at Stantons
You won't regret it. Check all the wiring and contact Carlton (Electrolaman) about a replacement rubber kit and service info, as well as tips on how to renew the "grab" of the turntable which is necessary for proper changing without shattering records.pallophotophone wrote:GregVTLA wrote:No fragile pot metal that I noticed going through mine, and for weight I'd have to guess around $200. Could get pretty expensive to ship, but this is one of my favorite machines and I'm sure you'd enjoy it.pallophotophone wrote:Are there any potential pot metal nasties laying in ambush ? Or was pot metal not used in this machine? And any idea of how shippable this is, weight wise ? MANY THANKS for any info !!
Hat's in the ring ! I've always wanted an orthophonic with a metal horn. Maybe it's my time.
Many Thanks !!
Between Greg, Carlton, and I we can probably walk you through any issues. It may be tedious to get everything serviced and adjusted, but once done, you will love this machine. Of course, if this was Bogantz' machine, it will likely be in pretty good order already!
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar