Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by gramophone78 »

[quote="raphael"]Just got a similar one as part of a big collection:

At least your sheet looks better.... :lol: :lol:. Sorry Bruce. I wanted to beat Steve this time... :lol: :lol:.

User avatar
Raphael
Victor IV
Posts: 1552
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:44 am
Location: Davie, FL
Contact:

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Raphael »

It's all in the cropping. My sheets are just as wrinkled!

User avatar
Brad
Victor III
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:12 pm
Personal Text: So many phonographs, so little money
Location: The Garden State

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Brad »

Bruce, the sheets are not wrinkled, that is "Craftsman Plaid".
Why do we need signatures when we are on a first avatar basis?

User avatar
ImperialGuardsman
Victor II
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:01 pm
Personal Text: Nothing like blaring Caruso out of your college dorm window...
Location: Oregon

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by ImperialGuardsman »

Great machine! Could you make a video of it playing? How about a 6 inch columbia record. Being a new collector, I had never heard of a 6 inch cylinder before. Did they sell well or were they a development right at the end of the columbia cylinder line?
ImperialGuardsman

OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member


~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~

User avatar
Tinkerbell
Victor III
Posts: 778
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Tinkerbell »

Brad wrote:Bruce, the sheets are not wrinkled, that is "Craftsman Plaid".
Then I guess one could say my husband has a lot of Craftsman Plaid shirts! :lol:

User avatar
Tinkerbell
Victor III
Posts: 778
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Tinkerbell »

Valecnik wrote:Maker: Columbia
Model: BGT "New Sovereign"
Years: Introduced in 1907
Original Cost: $70 with nickel horn, $80 with Symphony Mahogany, $85 with Spruce
Case/Cabinet size:
Turntable/Mandrel Size: 6 ½ inch
Reproducer/Soundbox: #11 or #12 (not sure)
Motor: Quadruple Spring
Horn Dimensions: 21.5 inches long 21 inch diameter
Repro Parts: none
Current Value Mint:
Interesting Facts: see below
Favorite Characteristics: See Below

Two & four minute machine set up to play standard cylinders as well as the six inch Columbia cylinders. A row of oiling tubes accessible on the back side of the bedplate make it possible to oil the machine without lifting the top works up. The Symphony mahogany horn was available from 1909 as well as 2 & 4 minute gearing. Given that this one is identified as a "BGT" stamped on the side of the upper works and on the paper tag under the lid, it probably dates from 1909 or a bit later.
Lovely machine, Bruce. Do you still have your website of your collection up?

I've missed the Featured Phonographs... :rose:

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by gramophone78 »

Tinkerball wrote: I've missed the Featured Phonographs... :rose:

Why don't you post one then??. I don't think you have....???

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3867
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Valecnik »

gramophone78 wrote:
raphael wrote:Just got a similar one as part of a big collection:

At least your sheet looks better.... :lol: :lol:. Sorry Bruce. I wanted to beat Steve this time... :lol: :lol:.
I go through all the work to photograph and upload these pictures hoping to stimulate some intellectual discussion about the Columbia line and what do I get??? Nothing but sheet from you all!!! :lol:

ImperialGuardsman wrote:Great machine! Could you make a video of it playing? How about a 6 inch columbia record. Being a new collector, I had never heard of a 6 inch cylinder before. Did they sell well or were they a development right at the end of the columbia cylinder line?
I'd love to make a video of it playing but unfortunately I don't have this one with me in Europe. An additional problem is I only have one 6 inch Columbia record in poor condition. These machines were made pretty close to the the end of the Columbia line and are not easy to find. According to Howard Hazelcorn, only 44 - 75 survive. They sound good but a large carriage Triumph sounds better.
Last edited by Valecnik on Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3867
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Valecnik »

Tinkerbell wrote: Lovely machine, Bruce. Do you still have your website of your collection up?

I've missed the Featured Phonographs... :rose:
Thanks Tink! Yes, the website is still up and is "new and improved" www.phonographcompany.com.

Also, over the summer, I took at least a hundred additional pics, (many better pics of machines already viewable on the site plus pics of new machines) that I have yet to put up there, all on Craftsman plaid background btw! Also, although the majority of the machines exhibited there are mine, not all are. The main purpose of the site is not to exhibit my collection but rather to offer good quality detailed pics to the collector community.

User avatar
Tinkerbell
Victor III
Posts: 778
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland

Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT

Post by Tinkerbell »

gramophone78 wrote: Tinkerball wrote: I've missed the Featured Phonographs... :rose:

Why don't you post one then??. I don't think you have....???
I might do that with my early (as in no model number) Brunswick, but the challenge is writing something up on a phonograph for which little historical information actually exists (other than what I was able to obtain from Mr. Wakeman).

I, unfortunately, do not have an impressive or interesting collection compared with the majority of collectors. I have to live vicariously through the acquisitions of other collectors here on the forum. :rose:

Post Reply