78 records still get a bad reputation.

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
User avatar
Edisonfan
Victor V
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:37 pm
Personal Text: Invention is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration
Location: Frederick Maryland

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by Edisonfan »

WOW! Great responses!

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by Wolfe »

A lot of places (especially record stores) don't want to handle them at all. Which often sends a person like me to the far corners of junk-ville to find them.

Phono48
Victor IV
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by Phono48 »

Whilst I agree with many of the above sentiments, there is another side to this discussion. I collect portable machines, and when I buy one, it usually comes with a load of 78s. Plus,because people got to know I collect records, I get given loads from house clearances. I am grateful, as there are usually some that I want to keep, and add to my already large collection. However, a great deal of them turn out to be the usual pot-boilers from the forties and fifties, Glenn Miller, Doris Day, Billy Cotton, Ruby Murray etc, etc, which surely every collector of this genre already has? I certainly have, so what to do with them? Waste of time putting them on Ebay, people won't pay more than a few pence for common stuff like this. Local charity shops are reluctant to take them,they already have loads of unsold records.(mainly, I suspect, because of the stupid prices they ask for anything remotely old). I've tried offering them to younger collectors, but again, they already have most of the ones on offer, or haven't the means or the inclination to collect them.I find the only way to get rid of them is to amass a few hundred at a time, and then put them into a local auction sale. They fetch very little, but at least they're out of my way, and cost me nothing.
Classical 12" instrumental records are the biggest nightmare, though. Nobody wants them! Until recently I had about thirty HMV and Columbia albums full of various symphonies and concertos going mouldy in the garage. I tried for months to offload them, but no luck. I was reluctant to throw them out, for the sake of history, but I've now kept the albums, because the inner sleeves can be useful, and taken the records to the local tip. As a collector, I don't like doing it, but I too, don't want to be buried under piles of unwanted items..
I recently raised the question about what to do with unwanted 78s on a Vintage Music site here in England. Some of the members expressed the view that no 78s should ever be disposed of, or destroyed. However, when I offered them loads of 78s free of charge, there was not one taker. I wonder why?

Barry

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by FloridaClay »

Space for proper storage is an issue. I am going to need to get shelves built for what I have and once those are filled I will be about at my limit. I would love to preserve everything that comes my way, but just don’t have space to do it.

I know our (U.S.) Library of Congress is working on preserving recording data and sound files for all the Victor recordings and will eventually have all of their 78s up until 78s went out of production in the 1950s.

http://victor.library.ucsb.edu/index.php

I wonder if similar things are being done for other labels.

The total numbers are so overwhelmingly large that it almost takes the resources of a large institution to handle it.

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

User avatar
Orchorsol
Victor IV
Posts: 1809
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:03 am
Location: Dover, UK
Contact:

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by Orchorsol »

FloridaClay wrote:Space for proper storage is an issue.

You're telling me! I've built strong shelving covering most of two walls in a fairly large room downstairs (and had to support the floor underneath), and I'm having to be careful how much weight goes upstairs as the collection continues to expand. Will there be no end to it... I hope not... :lol: But it's a challenge! Well over 8000 at present, in a fairly small house!

Then there's another 4000 or so duplicates and things I don't want, stored in an outbuilding at my mother's place. I too can't bear to throw any away. Now and again I list a huge job-lot of the lacklustre stuff on eBay and someone usually buys for a low price. I'd rather have the hassle of helping them load up than have to take 78s to the tip.
BCN thorn needles made to the original 1920s specifications: http://www.burmesecolourneedles.com

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe4DNb ... TPE-zTAJGg?

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by FloridaClay »

Veering off just slightly, when I get those shelves built (hopefully just after the first of the year) what do you guys and gals recommend in terms of the space between vertical supports/dividers? I am thinking somewhere along the lines of every 8 to 10 inches.

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

Online
User avatar
emgcr
Victor IV
Posts: 1188
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:57 am
Location: Hampshire, England.
Contact:

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by emgcr »

Mine are every 5 ½ inches with cut-backs at the top to enable easy handling.

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by FloridaClay »

Good idea about the cut-backs.

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

User avatar
Orchorsol
Victor IV
Posts: 1809
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:03 am
Location: Dover, UK
Contact:

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by Orchorsol »

I'd say it depends on what they're made from. 18mm MDF (painted) in my case, which is very stable and bears a lot of weight without bowing, so mine are 12 to 13" between dividers (which are less deep than the shelves). All fine and dead straight for nearly 10 years now!
Attachments
IMG_2080.JPG
BCN thorn needles made to the original 1920s specifications: http://www.burmesecolourneedles.com

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe4DNb ... TPE-zTAJGg?

User avatar
pictureroll
Victor I
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:41 pm
Location: Dallas,Texas 75228

Re: 78 records still get a bad reputation.

Post by pictureroll »

What is MDF?

Jerry F Bacon-Dallas,Tx USA ♫♫

Post Reply