Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
theoldlefthander
Victor Jr
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:58 pm

Re: Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Post by theoldlefthander »

No brainer: KEEP THEM BOTH!!!

User avatar
De Soto Frank
Victor V
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania

Re: Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Post by De Soto Frank »

OrthoSean wrote:My experience has always been that Columbia machines are far harder on records than Victor machines.

Sean
Any particular style Columbia machines, Sean ?


I am curious... I have a c. 1915 Columbia "Favorite", with what I assume is the "standard" Grafonola taper-tube, and a Columbia # 6 soundbox. It sounds very nice when playing, so I would be inclined to use it frequently... :(

Is it a matter of the tracking weight of Columbias, or the stylus to record geometry ?

I have not checked the tracking-weight on any of my machines, but it is on my mind to do-so, when I find an accurate scale...

:?
De Soto Frank

User avatar
ImperialGuardsman
Victor II
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:01 pm
Personal Text: Nothing like blaring Caruso out of your college dorm window...
Location: Oregon

Re: Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Post by ImperialGuardsman »

What a shame, the Columbia reproducer sounds rather nice and can handle even loud records well.
ImperialGuardsman

OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member


~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~

User avatar
OrthoSean
Victor V
Posts: 2912
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Near NY's Capital

Re: Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Post by OrthoSean »

Columbia reproducers DO sound good. The real drawback with them is the pivot system. I'm certainly not anti-Columbia, but I prefer Victors for playing because of the wear factor. While "Spring Cleaning" my workshop / storage area last night, I came across a Columbia Favorite I'd completely forgotten I had. Picked it up at a farm auction for $15 about 10 years ago and it's been buried under a pile of other stuff ever since :oops: . It's a perfect candidate for a complete restoration since the finish on the outside is basically gone from the oak cabinet and it's a cute little machine. I think in the next few weeks I'll start tearing into it and using it for some side by side wear tests with some duplicate junk records.

Sean

User avatar
ImperialGuardsman
Victor II
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:01 pm
Personal Text: Nothing like blaring Caruso out of your college dorm window...
Location: Oregon

Re: Keep a Columbia Grafonola or a VV-VI

Post by ImperialGuardsman »

OrthoSean wrote:Columbia reproducers DO sound good. The real drawback with them is the pivot system. I'm certainly not anti-Columbia, but I prefer Victors for playing because of the wear factor. While "Spring Cleaning" my workshop / storage area last night, I came across a Columbia Favorite I'd completely forgotten I had. Picked it up at a farm auction for $15 about 10 years ago and it's been buried under a pile of other stuff ever since :oops: . It's a perfect candidate for a complete restoration since the finish on the outside is basically gone from the oak cabinet and it's a cute little machine. I think in the next few weeks I'll start tearing into it and using it for some side by side wear tests with some duplicate junk records.

Sean
A comparison would be great! Be sure to post your findings.
ImperialGuardsman

OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member


~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~

Post Reply