Re: Criteria for Using a Machine for its Parts?
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:35 pm
Cody,
Given your scenario, I wouldn't feel too bad about it. I've been to many, (too many?), auctions where there are literally dozens of junk floor model phonographs, all lined up, sitting crooked on 3 legs, lids all askew, punched out speaker grills, peeling veneer, that will never be restored. There's just too many of them and we all have tons of projects with higher interest.
90 percent of these machines get parted out and the cabinets scrapped and/or burned. Right or wrong, that's just how it is.
Now, parting out a nice, viable phonograph of some actual value and high collectability, just because the sum of its parts is of greater value than the whole assembled machine, is a terrible waste, driven by greed, with no appreciation for history. You can draw parallels here to many of societies troubling trends today but, we'll just stick with phonographs for now.
My 2 cents anyway...
Given your scenario, I wouldn't feel too bad about it. I've been to many, (too many?), auctions where there are literally dozens of junk floor model phonographs, all lined up, sitting crooked on 3 legs, lids all askew, punched out speaker grills, peeling veneer, that will never be restored. There's just too many of them and we all have tons of projects with higher interest.
90 percent of these machines get parted out and the cabinets scrapped and/or burned. Right or wrong, that's just how it is.
Now, parting out a nice, viable phonograph of some actual value and high collectability, just because the sum of its parts is of greater value than the whole assembled machine, is a terrible waste, driven by greed, with no appreciation for history. You can draw parallels here to many of societies troubling trends today but, we'll just stick with phonographs for now.
My 2 cents anyway...