Graphophone Q - 2nd. Style change of parts.

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Patty
Victor Jr
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:47 pm
Location: Yorkshire England
Contact:

Re: Graphophone Q - 2nd. Style change of parts.

Post by Patty »

FloridaClay wrote:The Q mandrel tags come off and get lost and are sometimes removed by less than scrupulous sellers because they know they can get maybe $50 for it.

Clay

Very true! I did wonder if it was lost or removed.
Last edited by Patty on Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

19Orient10
Victor Jr
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Graphophone Q - 2nd. Style change of parts.

Post by 19Orient10 »

fran604g,

I don't believe that anyone has yet suggested that the mandrel with two holes may be from a Busy Bee machine. Although the two mandrels appear identical, the tapers are slightly different. An Edison or Columbia, etc. cylinder record will go only part way onto the Busy Bee mandrel. Short of comparing the measurements of the two mandrels, a cylinder record can serve as a quick method of determining what you have.

User avatar
fran604g
Victor VI
Posts: 3992
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:22 pm
Personal Text: I'm Feeling Cranky
Location: Hemlock, NY

Re: Graphophone Q - 2nd. Style change of parts.

Post by fran604g »

19Orient10 wrote:fran604g,

I don't believe that anyone has yet suggested that the mandrel with two holes may be from a Busy Bee machine. Although the two mandrels appear identical, the tapers are slightly different. An Edison or Columbia, etc. cylinder record will go only part way onto the Busy Bee mandrel. Short of comparing the measurements of the two mandrels, a cylinder record can serve as a quick method of determining what you have.
Correct. The mandrel diameter on a "Busy Bee" is substantially larger than the standard Q mandrel so it will only accept "Busy Bee" records. That isn't the case here, the tag is missing either because it fell off or was removed at some point, not entirely unheard of.

As was pointed out by George P. with Yamaphones very early Q (sn 311649), it seems a certainty that all Q's, even the earliest, had mandrel tags.

The question I presented was whether or not mine originally should have had one. The evidence suggests that it would have been produced and sold with one originally.

I have noticed that there seems to be different versions of the mandrel (and certainly other parts), and I'm wondering how many variations there may have been, and when those different parts may have been changed during the many years of production.

Fun stuff; mechanical anthropology. :)

Maybe I'll need to concentrate on buying as many Q's as I can find and dedicate my remaining years to the pursuit of discovering the "mandrel truth"...Call me Mr. Q...

Just kidding!

Fran
Francis; "i" for him, "e" for her
"Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while" - the unappreciative supervisor.

Patty
Victor Jr
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:47 pm
Location: Yorkshire England
Contact:

Re: Graphophone Q - 2nd. Style change of parts.

Post by Patty »

I shall follow you with this project I would like to learn about the mandrels of the Q too!

Post Reply