De Soto Frank wrote:Well, shucks. I was about to quote another post with a picture from Factory 22, but it looks like that post has disappeared.
I checked my C-19 DD player in Golden Oak, s/n 139485. This machine bears the cabinet Factory Label "Edison" ( in an arching logo ) Factory 18. The label is form 2430. The right-edge of the label is missing, so I cannot tell if there was a serial # .
Hiya Frank, thank you for the No.18 description.
I currently own 5 DD Phonographs with the aforementioned cabinet factory numbers:
No.2 (one on an A100 and one on a C19)
No.19 (two versions; the one that is the topic, and a different one on a C250)
No.33 (on a C19)
The "typical looking version" -- as I'll call it for now -- look like the one you describe and the ones pictured below, and are the "type" or "style" that I've always noted until seeing the version that this topic is all about.
All 4 of my "typical looking versions" have the form designation numbers clearly printed on them, as you can see by the pictures, 3 of them are "Form 890" and one is the same as your No.18: "Form 2430".
This is on my Mahogany C 250 SN 33187
This is on my A 100 SN 100111
This is on my Oak transitional C 19 SN 75399
This on my Oak C 19 SN 96451
De Soto Frank wrote:( Fran - I know this is not specifically requesting, but correlating s/n // finish // cabinet plant might relevant ? )
I don't know, but I hope that by doing this survey, perhaps these questions can eventually be answered, along with specific production figures.
phonogfp wrote:De Soto Frank wrote:
While there were many cabinet jobbers, were the cabinets shipped to Orange for final assembly, or were there regional Edison plants to do this ? The Diamond Disc player is a bit more complicated than the average "off-brand" talking machine.... I would presume some real skill and care was needed to install the phonograph workings....

As far as I know, all empty cabinets were shipped to West Orange for final assembly.
George P.
Thank you for that, George, I was thinking that Edison would have most likely wanted to have complete control over the completed machines, and especially for final inspection certainly. I can't imagine the company relying on other companies to do this.
Best,
Fran