Re: Just found a 1925 "Charleston" record in a box of record
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 11:41 am
1. Congratulations on your find!
2. The first 10" popular electrically recorded Brunswick was 2881 by the Brunswick Hour Orchestra, (I think?), then more consistently electric issues after 2900 (mid-May 1925) the latter being a Vernon Dalhart record (surprise, surprise, he also recorded one of the first electrically recorded vocals for Columbia in early April 1925).
3. I don't have 2970, but my guess is that it is one of those *lovely* Light-Ray recordings that sound half-acoustic/half-electric. Actually, I would like to know when that was dropped/what catalogue number represents the last of those. Records around 3000 sound more akin to what we would associate with electric records. There's an Isham Jones from the early 2900's that I have--the title escapes me, catalogue number 2915-ish, and the distortion that occurs when played on my HMV is horrible. It must be a Light-Ray recording; none of the Brunsiwck acoustics ever causes that on my machine.
2. The first 10" popular electrically recorded Brunswick was 2881 by the Brunswick Hour Orchestra, (I think?), then more consistently electric issues after 2900 (mid-May 1925) the latter being a Vernon Dalhart record (surprise, surprise, he also recorded one of the first electrically recorded vocals for Columbia in early April 1925).
3. I don't have 2970, but my guess is that it is one of those *lovely* Light-Ray recordings that sound half-acoustic/half-electric. Actually, I would like to know when that was dropped/what catalogue number represents the last of those. Records around 3000 sound more akin to what we would associate with electric records. There's an Isham Jones from the early 2900's that I have--the title escapes me, catalogue number 2915-ish, and the distortion that occurs when played on my HMV is horrible. It must be a Light-Ray recording; none of the Brunsiwck acoustics ever causes that on my machine.