Re: Victrola XVI
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:30 pm
We all have a different acceptance to restored or refinished machines. I have my own preferences. It's an argument that has no winner.
Jerry Blais
Jerry Blais
https://forum.talkingmachine.info/
I expressed my own preference. To each his own. My Sonora does have some alligatoring on the doors. See the doors for yourself and consider what you would do. I wouldn't dream of removing the finish. I don't think I would have purchased the Sonora in the first place had it suffered from excessive damage, but everyone has their own tolerance and abilities to make restoration repairs. Restore when possible, but refinishing is something I will avoid. http://forum.talkingmachine.info/viewto ... =2&t=21672gramophone-georg wrote:So would thin or nonexistent shellac in spots, scratches, watermarks, and alligatoring be considered "original"? If so, how? Just curious.briankeith wrote:I agree...audiophile102 wrote:I'm partial to machines with the original finish intact. It is quite beautiful, but I would have to let it go. It's only original once.
Understood about your own preference but considering the ravages of time to be somehow "original" has always puzzled me. It's the same thing in the classic car world... some people roll cars covered in surface rust and "patina" because "it's only original once".audiophile102 wrote:
I expressed my own preference. To each his own. My Sonora does have some alligatoring on the doors. See the doors for yourself and consider what you would do. I wouldn't dream of removing the finish. I don't think I would have purchased the Sonora in the first place had it suffered from excessive damage, but everyone has their own tolerance and abilities to make restoration repairs. Restore when possible, but refinishing is something I will avoid. http://forum.talkingmachine.info/viewto ... =2&t=21672
This Victrola is about 20 minutes south from me and as I said, I know the guy selling it. I have talked to him about other machines and I actually bought one from him before. I don't know what it was finished with, but I am hoping to go check it out this Sunday, so I will be able to be a better judge of the machine after giving it a good look over! I guess I should make some room just in case!Django wrote:Just a couple questions. Where is the machine located? Do you know what it is finished with? You will have to consider freight rates if is is far away.
Thanks
It looks pretty beat up, but so do many others that have been beautifully restored by members of this forum. I place a value on a project machine much lower than one with an intact original finish. I don't have the skills to recreate the finish of a 100+ year old antique. I have seen excellent examples of refinished machines that looked original. I saw a recreated cabinet at a meeting of the Wisconsin - Illinois Musical Antique Phonograph Society that could easily pass as original, however it's owner found a genuine refinishing artist Most look to my eyes like they just came off a modern assembly line except under the lid which frequently avoids the refinisher's stripper. It's the lifting of the lid that would reveal what was lost. Your Modernola project looks quite daunting, but those machines are so rare and beautiful your restoration expenses will be well worth the cost. Best of luck Jerry.Jerry B. wrote:How about this one? It's original. Leave it this way? I think I'll give it some good history.
Jerry Blais
That one's going to look SO GOOD once it's restored to, well... maybe not "factory new," but to what one would look like had it been in a home where it was used but lovingly cared for.Jerry B. wrote:How about this one? It's original. Leave it this way? I think I'll give it some good history.
Jerry Blais
A diamond in the rough.Jerry B. wrote:How about this one? It's original. Leave it this way? I think I'll give it some good history.
Jerry Blais