Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Cylinder Reproducer Questions

Post by Lucius1958 »

FellowCollector wrote:
VictorVV-X wrote: and the model H is for the Black Wax Amberols and two minute Indestructibles
"...for the Black Wax Amberols", yes. "...and two minute Indestructibles", no. The model H was not designed for play of any 2 minute cylinders including the Indestructibles. That said, the model H can play 2 minute Indestructible cylinders BUT the stylus was designed for a 4 minute groove and, therefore, the sound will be noticeably compromised.
It has been suggested, though, that a 4 minute stylus might possibly help with playing 2 minute Indestructibles that have suffered from shrinkage.

-Bill

VictorVV-X
Victor II
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by VictorVV-X »

Hello again all,
Thank you all for your help!

I decided to rename this post do to my having some further questions not reproducer related.
This time it is about horns.

I understand there were small horns and then there were horns that required a crane to support them. What was the difference between smaller and larger horns? Did it have to do with fidelity and volume, or just volume? For example; what kind of volume and fidelity would you get out of a 10-¾" horn vs. a 14" horn?

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8088
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by phonogfp »

VictorVV-X wrote: What was the difference between smaller and larger horns? Did it have to do with fidelity and volume, or just volume? For example; what kind of volume and fidelity would you get out of a 10-¾" horn vs. a 14" horn?
The difference is the fidelity, since a horn cannot increase volume or sound energy (although the perceived volume can increase). A larger horn allows the sound waves to expand in a natural manner without becoming diffused too quickly. The sound energy is directed and properly developed in a well-designed horn.

That said, the difference between a 10 ¾" horn and a 14" horn will probably be negligible if they're the same general shape. The flower-shaped horns that appeared in late 1904 do a better job than the earlier straight horns with conical bodies and applied bells.

This is a highly technical topic, but hopefully this simple explanation will make sense.

George P.

VictorVV-X
Victor II
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by VictorVV-X »

Here’s another question; on a machine with a horizontal carriage, could you use a witch’s hat horn with 45 degree elbow, or would it put undo stress on the carriage and reproducer?

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8088
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by phonogfp »

VictorVV-X wrote:Here’s another question; on a machine with a horizontal carriage, could you use a witch’s hat horn with 45 degree elbow, or would it put undo stress on the carriage and reproducer?
You can use a 45-degree elbow on a horizontal carriage and mount a 14" B&B horn or other lightweight self-supporting horn. Just know that by the time the horizontal carriages were introduced, the 14" B&B horns were no longer being supplied with Edison Phonographs, so the configuration is anachronistic.

The additional weight on the reproducer's tube plate shouldn't be a problem unless there is unstable pot metal present. This additional weight will also require proper adjustment and good lubrication of the upper works.

George P.

VictorVV-X
Victor II
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by VictorVV-X »

George, Thank you.

I am looking into a functional model F Edison Standard without a horn and wanted to make sure that, if I get it, the horn arrangement I mentioned would work until I find the proper horn.

Thanks again.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8088
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by phonogfp »

Glad to help. Good luck!

George P.

VictorVV-X
Victor II
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 7:57 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by VictorVV-X »

Can small divots/chips/nicks in a celluloid cylinder damage a sapphire/diamond stylus?

User avatar
marcapra
Victor V
Posts: 2180
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:29 am
Personal Text: Man who ride on tiger find it very difficult to dismount! Charlie Chan
Location: Temecula, CA

Re: Cylinder Phonograph Questions

Post by marcapra »

I have a number of 2 minute Indestructible cylinders. My only 2 minute machines are a Home model A with a C reproducer, and an Amberola 1A with an M reproducer. I also have a Diamond A reproducer on my Opera. Which of these machines, and which reproducer should I use to play a 2 minute Indestructible cylinder?

Post Reply