Best reproducer for 1945 records
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:13 pm
- Location: Blythe California
- Contact:
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Nice but I'm not into flocking! Seriously though thank for everything I got to get that Zenith looked at, its working just needs some finish work. That Victor 80 get all the attention though. My family gets a kick out of seeing it play even though it's around 100 years old. Those Mexican records my mom used to listen too is what I'm after. Going to Mexico in a few months to collect my Walton radio. Maybe I can find some more treasures out there again.
- Attachments
-
- received95397039321009715~2.jpg (64.38 KiB) Viewed 507 times
- AmberolaAndy
- Victor V
- Posts: 2702
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:15 pm
- Location: A small town near Omaha, Nebraska
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Ahh that Zenith featured in the Walton’s surprised they went with that radio for the show and not the Philco I have that I hope the repairman gets to next.BigC wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 3:09 pm Nice but I'm not into flocking! Seriously though thank for everything I got to get that Zenith looked at, its working just needs some finish work. That Victor 80 get all the attention though. My family gets a kick out of seeing it play even though it's around 100 years old. Those Mexican records my mom used to listen too is what I'm after. Going to Mexico in a few months to collect my Walton radio. Maybe I can find some more treasures out there again.
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:13 pm
- Location: Blythe California
- Contact:
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Wow thats really nice. I found that radio when I went to a antique store in Aguascalientes Mexico. What's funny is that it was playing when I walked in. A quick search in the internet and the fact that she only wanted $250 for it made me get it. Now I just have to bring it back and have it restored.
-
- Victor III
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:57 pm
- Personal Text: Started collecting in August 2020, small collection of records
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
The correct answer here is "A machine from the 40s." No matter what reproducer you put on your VV-80, you'll wear down any post '30s discs real quick. A No.4 will play pre 40s records nicely though
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:13 pm
- Location: Blythe California
- Contact:
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
That's what I wanted to know because I am really worried about those records from 1945. My mom said her family had a Victrola with a external horn so who knows what it was because she was only around 7 years old at the time. She recalls everyone would come to the ranch to listen to music because nobody had one in that area. It took my uncle 2 years to pay for it. They did use steal needles because she remembers them changing them out. Maybe the records from Mexico were not as modern as the American records? I don't know but one thing I would love is to play some old Mexican 78s for her on a Victor phonograph. Maybe I'll just have to sacrifice a couple of them and take my VV-50 to her house and have a concert.
- gramophone-georg
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4348
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Actually, they weren't as modern. If you use fiber needles, you don't really need to worry. A non compliant reproducer will wear the fiber needle out rather than the record.BigC wrote: Mon May 30, 2022 12:11 am That's what I wanted to know because I am really worried about those records from 1945. My mom said her family had a Victrola with a external horn so who knows what it was because she was only around 7 years old at the time. She recalls everyone would come to the ranch to listen to music because nobody had one in that area. It took my uncle 2 years to pay for it. They did use steal needles because she remembers them changing them out. Maybe the records from Mexico were not as modern as the American records? I don't know but one thing I would love is to play some old Mexican 78s for her on a Victor phonograph. Maybe I'll just have to sacrifice a couple of them and take my VV-50 to her house and have a concert.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- gramophone-georg
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4348
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Not entirely so. A correctly rebuilt #4 reproducer with a supple isolator will work fine on post 1940 shellac discs with soft tone, or preferably fiber, needles. I play post 1940s records on my 10-50 and 10-35 changers quite frequently with a correctly rebuilt Orthophonic reproducer and Tungs Tone soft tone needles with no ill effects. Cleaning the records properly also helps.gunnarthefeisty wrote: Sun May 29, 2022 11:44 pm The correct answer here is "A machine from the 40s." No matter what reproducer you put on your VV-80, you'll wear down any post '30s discs real quick. A No.4 will play pre 40s records nicely though
I'd use fiber needles, but these sort of defeat the whole purpose of a changer.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:13 pm
- Location: Blythe California
- Contact:
Re: Best reproducer for 1945 records
Ohhhh Funny thing you mentioned the Tungs Tone needles because I am new to this hobby but I'm also extremely OCD. I collect everything I can find and as you know I ask questions about everything. Anyway back to the Tungs Tone needles I have a tin full of of them I got with a purchase of a VV-50.