Page 2 of 2
Re: Victor long playing records
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:56 am
by Lenoirstreetguy
Aren't most of the classical sides dubs? In fact wasn't the Beethoven Fifth with Stokowski and the Philadelphia orchestra the only orchestral classical issue that WASN'T a dub? It was the one the company played at the press reception where the records were introduced.
Jim
Re: Victor long playing records
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:43 am
by Wolfe
I may have been considered too expensive to go about recording brand new masters.
Still, pushing long playing discs of things that were already in the catalog, or were just a few years earlier, wasn't very enticing. Especially if they were dubbed from noisy scrolls.

Re: Victor long playing records
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:12 am
by Henry
Wolfe wrote:Still, pushing long playing discs of things that were already in the catalog, or were just a few years earlier, wasn't very enticing. Especially if they were dubbed from noisy scrolls.

Mm-m, does anybody see an analogy here between LPs and their CD reissues?

Re: Victor long playing records
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:25 pm
by Nat
Not an LP, but Tully Potter's notes for the Busch Quartet Beethoven recordings (EMI - Great Recordings of the Century) notes that, "At the very first sessions, the HMV team put themselves out to help [Busch] realize his vision of Op. 95 in F minor, achieving a side of six minutes 18 seconds [my italics] so that the slow movement could be heard uninterrupted."
I didn't realize a 78 rpm "take"that long was possible!
(Op 95 is best heard on the Dutton reissue; it's not included in the EMI set, above.)
Nat