Page 2 of 2

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 10:00 am
by Inigo
Yes! More bass, yet clearer and more balanced sound, and the sibilants much more present without being shrill
Congratulations!
(That's the same quality difference that can be noticed between the hmv no4 and the no5b.. I'm currently playing an old tatty hmv 127 tabletop and switched the original no4 soundbox for a restored 5b, and the sound is overwhelming!)

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 12:17 pm
by Orchorsol
Yes indeed - even via YouTube the "EMG magic" is very much evident! - and yes, the restored sound has more bass and balance. Congratulations, super result!

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 6:08 pm
by Hoodoo
It could just be the photographs, but it looks to me like the U-shaped tube of the tonearm on the left has a tighter bend than the one on the right and would not have the proper offset/tracking.
I have crudely drawn in lines to illustrate what I mean.

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 4:04 am
by Orchorsol
I think that's probably because the main length is twisted in a different orientation between the two. The base of the left one is approximately vertical, the right is not.

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:18 am
by emgcr
HMV130 wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 4:35 pm I then tested the soundbox before and after restoration and I think the result is quite good - the sound is fuller and more balanced, with less prominent noise/hiss. Please consider the following link - https://youtu.be/bJlanENVSQk?feature=shared
Just back from holiday and agree completely with your comments. A greatly superior reproduction with real quality and depth---irritating sibilance much reduced. An important and worthwhile operation which will enhance your appreciation of the EMG and its capabilities. Also a very clever video which I would not know how to achieve. Well done and thank you !

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2025 10:21 am
by emgcr
Hoodoo wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 6:08 pm It could just be the photographs, but it looks to me like the U-shaped tube of the tonearm on the left has a tighter bend than the one on the right and would not have the proper offset/tracking.
I agree with Andy and I am 100% certain EMG would not have made a mistake with such an important feature of their tonearm design which would have been manufactured with the aid of very precise jigs.

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:59 pm
by HMV130
I confirm, it is just because of the angle of the picture.

I just managed to find a suitable record for tuning, with loud and soft passages for both trebles and bass, and fine tuned the soundbox accordingly. For those interested please consider the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N32bizVOXnc.

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 5:39 pm
by Orchorsol
HMV130 wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:59 pm I confirm, it is just because of the angle of the picture.

I just managed to find a suitable record for tuning, with loud and soft passages for both trebles and bass, and fine tuned the soundbox accordingly. For those interested please consider the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N32bizVOXnc.
Congratulations, a really superb result! Especially for a 2-spring soundbox. In my experience the 4-spring soundboxes are generally more suited to complex soundscapes such as orchestral music.

Re: EMG Mk. IX

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:25 pm
by emgcr
First class result---very well done---superb sound at every level.