gregbogantz wrote: Although there may have been variations in the weights of the various components in these inertia arm systems during their several years of manufacture, the several in my possession I have measured and they produce the same tracking force as the earlier straight arm in my RE-75 which is also about the same as that of the Victor acoustic orthophonic reproducer at around 150 grams.
You mean LATE straight arm, don't you? The counterweight was made heavier towards the end of production of the first series Micro-Synchronous Electrola. Earlier machines tracked rather heavier, and the hollow arm Electrolas of 1926, 1927 and 1927 tracked heavier still. late examples of. The inertia arm, those dating after 1933 or so, tend to track at a lighter weight than the arms used on the RE-57 and Radiola 86 because they were designed for use with an improved pickup, with a combination of viscoloid and spring damping. Of course these late pickups are pretty thin on the ground, as combinations were not selling all that well in 1934 and 1935. A pickup arm that I own which was salvaged from a High Fidelity Victrola R-99 (the fellow from whom I purchased it sold the amplifier and speaker to Asia and broke up the otherwise clean cabinet

Note that the Victor engineers found that the more heavily counterweighted tone arm of late 1930 tended to increase record wear, particularly on heavily recorded discs for the incompliant stylus would tend to ride up to tfragile tops of the grooves in the loud passages. This the Inertia arm corrected. Record wear is actually appreciably lessened with the use of this improved arm as opposed to earlier, less compliant units, most particularly the crude, rigid, poorly counterbalanced GE pickup arm used on the Radiolas 47 and 67.
By the way, Mr. Bogantz do you still offer your excellent diaphragms for Diamond Disc machines? I purchased a machine with one of your rebuilt reproducers on it some years ago and found it to be really excellent.