Page 2 of 2
Re: High Fidelity 78 rpm discs
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:41 pm
by Wolfe
JHolmesesq wrote:Wolfe wrote:Victor was doing some impressive truer hi-fi things closer to the early thirties. This record is not hi-fi. Looking at the audio on a spectrum analyzer shows the audio to drop off exactly at 10,000 cycles, somewhat short of the range of 15,000 to 20,000 cycles needed for true hi-fi in the treble end. The video caption claims 18,000 cycles.
Hmm, how odd. All I went on for that is what my friend said - I haven't the technology to do that myself. Perhaps youtube does something to it?
Yes, possibly could be. I wasn't trying to be harsh or accusatory.
It's an excellent sounding transfer in any case, and you have a very nice channel going there.
Re: High Fidelity 78 rpm discs
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:32 am
by JHolmesesq
Wolfe wrote:JHolmesesq wrote:Wolfe wrote:Victor was doing some impressive truer hi-fi things closer to the early thirties. This record is not hi-fi. Looking at the audio on a spectrum analyzer shows the audio to drop off exactly at 10,000 cycles, somewhat short of the range of 15,000 to 20,000 cycles needed for true hi-fi in the treble end. The video caption claims 18,000 cycles.
Hmm, how odd. All I went on for that is what my friend said - I haven't the technology to do that myself. Perhaps youtube does something to it?
Yes, possibly could be. I wasn't trying to be harsh or accusatory.
It's an excellent sounding transfer in any case, and you have a very nice channel going there.
Sorry, my mistake - it's so easy to confuse meanings without the context (i.e I can't see your face when you tell me this). This is probably the single largest cause of online arguments.
But thanks for the channel compliments!