Patrick Feaster gave a wonderful presentation on the 'pre-history' of the phonograph at the ARSC convention in 2008 when we unveiled the first computer-assisted reproduction of phonoautograms recorded by Léon Scott 20 years before Edison's phonograph. What was so interesting is that no one even thought about the concept of recording and reproducing existing sound. For whatever reason, no serious inventor ever made that theoretical leap. Instead, all focus was on mechanically creating sound, not reproducing it. It was all about machines that could simulate speech, not record it and play it back. Even at the NY World's Fair of 1939 one of the biggest sensations was the
"Voder" created by Bell labs -- a robot that 'talked' by virtue of a highly-trained technician manipulating a keyboard.
I have no doubt that a watchmaker with the brilliance of Breguet could have built a working phonograph in the late 1700s -- if anyone could even conceive it. But that goes back to what George referred to in his post: no one in the 1960s, even after the computer was a well-known (if insanely expensive) reality could have made the mental leap to envision the Internet. Even when computers were proposed for home use it was thought that all they could be good for was storing recipes........
The skill existed centuries ago but the concept didn't. It makes me wonder what astonishingly obvious future staple of daily life has yet to even been dreamed about, let alone experimented with.
EDIT TO ADD: Facebook is only 8 years old.......... Can you begin to imagine that the entire concept of Facebook and Twitter and other 'social networking' was not even a dream as recently as 10 years ago? It's no surprise that no one in the 18th century could conceive of a phonograph, as simple as it was.