Re: HMV 5 soundbox versions
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 6:32 am
I have an HMV5 with oxidized cover (a dull grey). I don't know about the reasons for HMV to abandon it, but the one I have is identical to the orthophonic Victor in all external aspects. I have not opened it because it works well. I am sure it has the same pot metal fragility as Victor's, but it does not appear to be any worse, and certainly not more fragile than the 5a and 5b are today. If it was already fragile 80 years ago one cannot tell, but if it were just a case of error in the fabrication of the amalgam, HMV could have corrected it without changing the design to something different. The HMV 4 was made before the HMV5, and most of the production was pot metal with a smaller quantity made in brass (like the Victor 4/4a), so HMV had already experience in producing pot metal soundboxes when it undertook to make the nr 5.
Soundwise my HMV5 is better than all the other HMVs I have (exhibition, 2, 4, 5a and 5b). Evidently the sonic assessment needs to be put in perspective, since all I can say pertains to the particular soundboxes I own, and I would not generalize to say that all HMV5s sound better. I have two 5b soundboxes that look externally identical, but one has a much reduced frequency response in both ends of the spectrum than the other. Why is that I cannot tell.
Soundwise my HMV5 is better than all the other HMVs I have (exhibition, 2, 4, 5a and 5b). Evidently the sonic assessment needs to be put in perspective, since all I can say pertains to the particular soundboxes I own, and I would not generalize to say that all HMV5s sound better. I have two 5b soundboxes that look externally identical, but one has a much reduced frequency response in both ends of the spectrum than the other. Why is that I cannot tell.