Re: The Price Of A Machine New In Today's Money
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:24 pm
When my mother completed high school in 1940, she took a secretarial job in Mahnattan for $15 per week. Out of that, she spent 25 cents each day for expenses - 10 cents for transportation (2 subway rides at 5 cents each), and 15 cents for lunch at the Automat (sandwich, coffee, and pie, each 5 cents) She had a further 2 dollars or so each week for pocket money, but the rest had to be turned over to my grandmother for household expenses. After a year, she was given a raise to $16 per week. Her next job paid $75 per month. Again, this is the early 1940s in New York City, so just imagine how little most people made years earlier, particularly in rural areas. If a record costs about ½ a day's pay, how could you possibly afford a phonograph?Starkton wrote:Here is a sample calculation: The price of my Grammophon De Luxe was £49 in 1908. It follows a "real price" of £4000 in 2010 which seems expensive but not overpriced for a high-end sound system. But the "real value" of £49 in 1908 on the basis of the average income is much higher. A calculation made on this basis reveals the astonishing income value of £25,000 for the De Luxe, if bought in 2010.
In order to substantiate that data: a German teacher in 1900 earned about £60 a year. Today his average income (calculated on the basis of the above method) would be £30,700, which even sounds below average.
Today's exchange rate: £10 = $16