Re: Colonial Portables
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:44 pm
Here are the photos of my HMV102 (sorry for the upside down, I cannot figure how to realign it):
https://forum.talkingmachine.info/
I am not sure if I can shed more light, but as you can see in the photos, these ARE high end, well-made machines. Evidently mine does not have the stripes - I have one HMV 118 that is striped - but yours could be a variation. Besides that, you should make sure that the motor board has the number carved on it (most colonial models, including the horn machines like the HMV32 and the 102 shown above, have them) and also the aluminum plate indicating the model. Having said that, I just checked my 118 and it does not have the carved number, and its tag is an ivorine one, not aluminum. And I would be suspicious of quality flaws like the missing guiding pin (and hole) you mention in yours. HMV had excellent quality control. And I believe (Epigramophone or Steve may correct me) that these teak machines were actually made in England, for export to India.Teak wrote:I thought of them as high end, very expensive versions. I understand, that time will wear down those machines, but wouldn't this thing have had all the things right, as it was more expensive than a normal one? I am really on the fence here.400 is highly expensive for a possible lemon. Normally I am all up for risky business, but that is maybe even to much for me.
Lets hope Carlos pictures shed some more light!
The last Indian made gramophones were " end of line" machines assembled in India from bits sent to them from England , don't expect them to have the same fitments !Or the same quality , I have seen and sold many of these as a friend of mine lived in Calcutta in the 1980s and shipped machines ( including good horn machines etc many of which were teak but made to look mahogany ) to us for sale , they were dead right but quality they were often not !I do believe this is a genuine machine , when you get it you can check the motor board to see if it has been replaced at sometimeCarlosV wrote:I am not sure if I can shed more light, but as you can see in the photos, these ARE high end, well-made machines. Evidently mine does not have the stripes - I have one HMV 118 that is striped - but yours could be a variation. Besides that, you should make sure that the motor board has the number carved on it (most colonial models, including the horn machines like the HMV32 and the 102 shown above, have them) and also the aluminum plate indicating the model. Having said that, I just checked my 118 and it does not have the carved number, and its tag is an ivorine one, not aluminum. And I would be suspicious of quality flaws like the missing guiding pin (and hole) you mention in yours. HMV had excellent quality control. And I believe (Epigramophone or Steve may correct me) that these teak machines were actually made in England, for export to India.Teak wrote:I thought of them as high end, very expensive versions. I understand, that time will wear down those machines, but wouldn't this thing have had all the things right, as it was more expensive than a normal one? I am really on the fence here.400 is highly expensive for a possible lemon. Normally I am all up for risky business, but that is maybe even to much for me.
Lets hope Carlos pictures shed some more light!
How did you realign them?soundgen wrote:Carlos images the right way round !
As far as I am aware, all the HMV teak machines were assembled in the Calcutta factory using their locally made cases fitted with British components sent out from Hayes. This arrangement greatly reduced import duties, and there was a readily available source of teak which suited the climate in which the machines were used.CarlosV wrote:I am not sure if I can shed more light, but as you can see in the photos, these ARE high end, well-made machines. Evidently mine does not have the stripes - I have one HMV 118 that is striped - but yours could be a variation. Besides that, you should make sure that the motor board has the number carved on it (most colonial models, including the horn machines like the HMV32 and the 102 shown above, have them) and also the aluminum plate indicating the model. Having said that, I just checked my 118 and it does not have the carved number, and its tag is an ivorine one, not aluminum. And I would be suspicious of quality flaws like the missing guiding pin (and hole) you mention in yours. HMV had excellent quality control. And I believe (Epigramophone or Steve may correct me) that these teak machines were actually made in England, for export to India.Teak wrote:I thought of them as high end, very expensive versions. I understand, that time will wear down those machines, but wouldn't this thing have had all the things right, as it was more expensive than a normal one? I am really on the fence here.400 is highly expensive for a possible lemon. Normally I am all up for risky business, but that is maybe even to much for me.
Lets hope Carlos pictures shed some more light!