I’m new to this

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
PeanutTheRabbit
Victor O
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:43 pm

Re: I’m new to this

Post by PeanutTheRabbit »

Oooooo thank you! One of my favorite discs is from the 20’s. Song of india, and Cho Cho San. I highly recommend giving it a listen! ^^
https://youtu.be/AMvhlIBjg0o

VanEpsFan1914
Victor VI
Posts: 3375
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:39 am
Personal Text: I've got both kinds of music--classical & rag-time.
Location: South Carolina

Re: I’m new to this

Post by VanEpsFan1914 »

PeanutTheRabbit wrote:Oooooo thank you! One of my favorite discs is from the 20’s. Song of india, and Cho Cho San. I highly recommend giving it a listen! ^^
https://youtu.be/AMvhlIBjg0o
That's a good one! I've listened to that one many a time-- I have some different renditions of "Song of India" as well, one being a classical take from the 1940s, and one being the Tommy Dorsey version which is decidedly not classical music. Rimsky-Korsakov's music seemed to be very popular in the early 20th century.

That particular record of yours (Song of India/Cho-Cho-San) is a classic for more than one reason. A small Victor phonograph and a copy of this record helped to inspire William Saroyan to become a writer. (I believe by the $10 price tag that his new phonograph was a Victor Junior horn gramophone.) Here in the link is the story of the first encounter of the Saroyans with records and music.

https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/fil ... 11-ela.pdf

edisonplayer
Victor IV
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:33 pm

Re: I’m new to this

Post by edisonplayer »

I remember reading the story in a book when I went to high school.edisonplayer

User avatar
mick_vt
Victor I
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:09 pm
Personal Text: Foxtrotaholic
Location: Central Vermont

Re: I’m new to this

Post by mick_vt »

VanEpsFan1914 wrote:Oh yes. What ^^ Jerry B said.

Your Victrola is old--even if it is a 1920s machine it still was a design invented in 1912. So this ancient "Gilded Age" technology just doesn't handle the soft vinyl of late 1940s-'50s discs. You need regular shellac 78s.

I don't know how much you figured out yet about records but in 1925, Victor started making "Orthophonic Records" that sound just about like modern stuff. They used a microphone. The early "acoustic" records were made through a metal horn with no electronics whatsoever. Anyway, they came up with some different Victrolas to play them on, and Orthophonic Victrolas are sought after today. Columbia Graphophone jumped on it with the Viva-Tonal machines, and Brunswick came up with the Panatrope, and everybody started switching away from acoustic records and by 1930 the old acoustic 78 was pretty much gone.

Then they started changing the formula for records, later, and by the 1940s they started using a softer composition because the old windup Victrolas were going away too. (Not quickly--but some.) They now had electric phonographs which had been developing since the late '20s. They came out with them and by the late 1930s, most record players were electric except for some portables that were still cranked, and a few regular crank phonographs used in rural districts before Rural Electrification came along with FDR's New Deal. (These old things are a complete history lesson in themselves!)

And anyway, for your Victrola VV-IV, you'll want to get some original 1900s, 1910s and '20s records, maybe some from the '30s and early '40s. But if it's soft vinyl, it won't play well. I put you a few pics up to give an idea but I got to run now so maybe more later.
That Victor label is generally a good indicator of an acoustic recording, but watch out, if it has VE in an ellipse imprinted on the record itself , it's actually electronically recorded, and like the later scroll label records is really for Orthophonic machines

PeanutTheRabbit
Victor O
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:43 pm

Re: I’m new to this

Post by PeanutTheRabbit »

I’m desperate for more batwing records. If anyone here wants to get rid of a lot, please lemme know.

User avatar
gramophone-georg
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4347
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA

Re: I’m new to this

Post by gramophone-georg »

mick_vt wrote:
VanEpsFan1914 wrote:Oh yes. What ^^ Jerry B said.

Your Victrola is old--even if it is a 1920s machine it still was a design invented in 1912. So this ancient "Gilded Age" technology just doesn't handle the soft vinyl of late 1940s-'50s discs. You need regular shellac 78s.

I don't know how much you figured out yet about records but in 1925, Victor started making "Orthophonic Records" that sound just about like modern stuff. They used a microphone. The early "acoustic" records were made through a metal horn with no electronics whatsoever. Anyway, they came up with some different Victrolas to play them on, and Orthophonic Victrolas are sought after today. Columbia Graphophone jumped on it with the Viva-Tonal machines, and Brunswick came up with the Panatrope, and everybody started switching away from acoustic records and by 1930 the old acoustic 78 was pretty much gone.

Then they started changing the formula for records, later, and by the 1940s they started using a softer composition because the old windup Victrolas were going away too. (Not quickly--but some.) They now had electric phonographs which had been developing since the late '20s. They came out with them and by the late 1930s, most record players were electric except for some portables that were still cranked, and a few regular crank phonographs used in rural districts before Rural Electrification came along with FDR's New Deal. (These old things are a complete history lesson in themselves!)

And anyway, for your Victrola VV-IV, you'll want to get some original 1900s, 1910s and '20s records, maybe some from the '30s and early '40s. But if it's soft vinyl, it won't play well. I put you a few pics up to give an idea but I got to run now so maybe more later.
That Victor label is generally a good indicator of an acoustic recording, but watch out, if it has VE in an ellipse imprinted on the record itself , it's actually electronically recorded, and like the later scroll label records is really for Orthophonic machines
Yes, but the dirty little secret is that earlier Victrolas play these electrical records quite well with a Victrola or HMV No. 4 sound box, which is a straight swap with an Exhibition or Victrola No. 2.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek

I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar

PeanutTheRabbit
Victor O
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:43 pm

Re: I’m new to this

Post by PeanutTheRabbit »

My rebuilt exhibition reproducer arrived today...and omg...it sounds amazing

User avatar
mick_vt
Victor I
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:09 pm
Personal Text: Foxtrotaholic
Location: Central Vermont

Re: I’m new to this

Post by mick_vt »

gramophone-georg wrote:
Yes, but the dirty little secret is that earlier Victrolas play these electrical records quite well with a Victrola or HMV No. 4 sound box, which is a straight swap with an Exhibition or Victrola No. 2.
I know that dirty secret, I have a modified orthophonic reproducer specifically for this :D

User avatar
mick_vt
Victor I
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:09 pm
Personal Text: Foxtrotaholic
Location: Central Vermont

Re: I’m new to this

Post by mick_vt »

PeanutTheRabbit wrote:My rebuilt exhibition reproducer arrived today...and omg...it sounds amazing
Makes quite a difference huh? I remember the first time I heard a rebuilt unit, having previously only used a clapped out original... night and day!

PeanutTheRabbit
Victor O
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 9:43 pm

Re: I’m new to this

Post by PeanutTheRabbit »

So my phonograph developed a loud squeaking sound. I sent it to George Vollema. Is he any good?

Post Reply