Page 4 of 4

Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:56 pm
by Norfolkguy
kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea

:lol:
It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare! :lol:

Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:02 pm
by kirtley2012
Norfolkguy wrote:
kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea

:lol:
It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare! :lol:
yes, and theres a scratch on the record where billy fury accidentally slid his soundbox over it, certainly it should be $15,000 :lol:

Re: Target practice with 78s better for the environment?

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:06 pm
by Norfolkguy
kirtley2012 wrote:
Norfolkguy wrote:
kirtley2012 wrote:i just gave them a old Billy Fury record no. F 11409 pressed in india, on a blue label decca, thought it would be good for....oh....oh no....oh dear.......http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BILLY-FURY-78 ... 1c1da88dea

:lol:
It's a good thing there's no sleeve, it would be even more valuable and rare! :lol:
yes, and theres a scratch on the record where billy fury accidentally slid his soundbox over it, certainly it should be $15,000 :lol:
At least! Being so shiny and all..... :P Ah ebay, hope spring eternal! :coffee: