Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories

Buy Records for the Label, Recording or Both?

Label only
3
8%
Recording only
11
30%
Both Label and Recording
23
62%
 
Total votes: 37

Pathe Logical
Victor II
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by Pathe Logical »

Django --- PM sent!

User avatar
Curt A
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6845
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Personal Text: Needle Tins are Addictive
Location: Belmont, North Carolina

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by Curt A »

Recording only - UNLESS Black Patti, Black Swan, Paramount labels or Picture discs or multi-color swirl discs of any kind - Aeolian-Vocalion, Morrison, Brunswick, etc.
"The phonograph† is not of any commercial value."
Thomas Alva Edison - Comment to his assistant, Samuel Insull.

"No one needs a Victrola XX, a Perfected Graphophone Type G, or whatever you call those noisy things."
My Wife

User avatar
MisterGramophone
Victor I
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2023 3:05 pm
Personal Text: Guess I’m OrthoFan’s Apeophone now!
Location: The Land of Uncle Sam

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by MisterGramophone »

I honestly feel like the recording is more important than the label unless it is an Edison and you only own a Victor machine or something or it is from a label that you have never heard of or a super rare label.
Last edited by MisterGramophone on Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If I were a troll, I would not post on the Talking Machine Forum; I would live under a bridge, post on Reddit, and eat goats for dinner!

edisonplayer
Victor IV
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:33 pm

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by edisonplayer »

The first Black Swan record I found I bought for the label edisonplayer

User avatar
Django
Victor IV
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:31 pm
Location: New Hampshire’s West Coast

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by Django »

If I decide to keep any of these three, it will be primarily for the label. I brought this thread back because I had come across these records and felt that they may have historical or rarity value. I have been trying to determine an approximate value, but I have only found record of one sale, and that record was listed as being in excellent condition and the sale was in 2012, (these are in fair to good condition, and I will not try to play them). I had wrongly thought that that the one where the dog first appeared, (previous post), was the most valuable, but I was wrong.
Attachments
IMG_5871.jpeg
IMG_5870.jpeg
IMG_5869.jpeg

An Balores
Victor I
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2023 6:05 am

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by An Balores »

I am more interested in the music than the label (mostly jazz and dance), although unusual labels have fallen into my hands occasionally by chance. Like this one, Reviera:
2024-01-10 12.49.16.jpg
All I can discover about it is that it (and others, if there were any) was recorded & manufactured by Metropole/Piccadilly and that the recording dates from about September 1931.
The reverse side is 'A Blackbird's Song' by the same artiste, Madge Varcoe. It is thought to be a solitary issue.
Varcoe is, of course, a Cornish name. Apart from her recording, it is believed that she also broadcast. A sister of hers was also a noted vocalist but, sadly, all the siblings died young, seemingly from TB. The Varcoe family did Ladies’ Fashions and haberdashery, the shop was opposite the Plaza Cinema in St Austell.

User avatar
epigramophone
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 5700
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by epigramophone »

This label was discussed in the CLPGS magazine, issues 45 and 46, Spring and Summer 2013.
The consensus was that R.1 was the only record issued, and confirmed that it was a product of Metropole Industries Ltd.
By September 1931 the Metropole label had been discontinued, but the cheaper Piccadilly struggled on until 1932.

pianolist
Victor I
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:59 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by pianolist »

I always hesitate to use the term record collector since I don’t collect records, I collect the music I like. It happens to be on records. I rarely look at the label if it is a title I like. The only reason I look at the label is to see if it is a quality recording company or if it might be a little iffy or noisy. I’ve been doing this since I was 8, 60 some years ago so there are a “few” records in the house. But - I’m not a record collector. 😉

User avatar
Curt A
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6845
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:32 pm
Personal Text: Needle Tins are Addictive
Location: Belmont, North Carolina

Re: Buying Records for the label, recording, or both?

Post by Curt A »

I have to add one more criteria that I apply to "most" records - the timeframe. I normally don't like WWI era records (exceptions: National Aires/Stars and Stripes Forever Aeolian-Vocalion swirl discs) or earlier recordings. My preference is typically early twenties to early thirties, with some exceptions, but that's just me.
"The phonograph† is not of any commercial value."
Thomas Alva Edison - Comment to his assistant, Samuel Insull.

"No one needs a Victrola XX, a Perfected Graphophone Type G, or whatever you call those noisy things."
My Wife

Post Reply