Re: HMV No:4 Soundbox question.
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 2:24 am
Clear, thanks. Logic results, because not only the diaphragm material and size is involved in the sound, also the details and thickness of the air chamber behind it plays a role. The air chamber in the no4 behind that corrugated diaphragm has a strange shape.
No wonder the Victor orthophonic and HMV 5a/5b are among the best sounding soundboxes when properly restored. They have several refinements, among them the air chamber of thin thickness all constant across the diaphragm area, the phase plug, etc. that altogether make them (arguably) the best soundboxes ever made. Their sound is so well balanced and the range so wide...
I've tested the Meltrope III in several machines against the HMV 5a, and, frankly, I find the HMV much better. There Meltrope has more bass but lack of treble, making it in the end a bit bumpy, and not so well balanced as the HMV. Again, there's a notorious difference among them two in the shape and size of the air chamber behind the diaphragm... and the Meltrope has no spider, an essential element in making the frequency response wider and well balanced...
No wonder the Victor orthophonic and HMV 5a/5b are among the best sounding soundboxes when properly restored. They have several refinements, among them the air chamber of thin thickness all constant across the diaphragm area, the phase plug, etc. that altogether make them (arguably) the best soundboxes ever made. Their sound is so well balanced and the range so wide...
I've tested the Meltrope III in several machines against the HMV 5a, and, frankly, I find the HMV much better. There Meltrope has more bass but lack of treble, making it in the end a bit bumpy, and not so well balanced as the HMV. Again, there's a notorious difference among them two in the shape and size of the air chamber behind the diaphragm... and the Meltrope has no spider, an essential element in making the frequency response wider and well balanced...